전체기사 최신뉴스 GAM
KYD 디데이
글로벌

속보

더보기

오바마 연두교서 전문(영문)

기사입력 :

최종수정 :

※ 본문 글자 크기 조정

  • 더 작게
  • 작게
  • 보통
  • 크게
  • 더 크게

※ 번역할 언어 선택

The State of the Union Wednesday, January 27, 2009 Washington, DC

Madame Speaker, Vice President Biden, Members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:
Our Constitution declares that from time to time, the President shall give to Congress information about the state of our union. For two hundred and twenty years, our leaders have fulfilled this duty. They have done so during periods of prosperity and tranquility. And they have done so in the midst of war and depression; at moments of great strife and great struggle.
It's tempting to look back on these moments and assume that our progress was inevitable that America was always destined to succeed. But when the Union was turned back at Bull Run and the Allies first landed at Omaha Beach, victory was very much in doubt. When the market crashed on Black Tuesday and civil rights marchers were beaten on Bloody Sunday, the future was anything but certain. These were times that tested the courage of our convictions, and the strength of our union. And despite all our divisions and disagreements; our hesitations and our fears; America prevailed because we chose to move forward as one nation, and one people.
Again, we are tested. And again, we must answer history's call.
One year ago, I took office amid two wars, an economy rocked by severe recession, a financial system on the verge of collapse, and a government deeply in debt. Experts from across the political spectrum warned that if we did not act, we might face a second depression. So we acted immediately and aggressively. And one year later, the worst of the storm has passed.
But the devastation remains. One in ten Americans still cannot find work. Many businesses have shuttered. Home values have declined. Small towns and rural communities have been hit especially hard. For those who had already known poverty, life has become that much harder.
This recession has also compounded the burdens that America's families have been dealing with for decades the burden of working harder and longer for less; of being unable to save enough to retire or help kids with college.
So I know the anxieties that are out there right now. They're not new. These struggles are the reason I ran for President. These struggles are what I've witnessed for years in places like Elkhart, Indiana and Galesburg, Illinois. I hear about them in the letters that I read each night. The toughest to read are those written by children asking why they have to move from their home, or when their mom or dad will be able to go back to work.
For these Americans and so many others, change has not come fast enough. Some are frustrated; some are angry. They don't understand why it seems like bad behavior on Wall Street is rewarded but hard work on Main Street isn't; or why Washington has been unable or unwilling to solve any of our problems. They are tired of the partisanship and the shouting and the pettiness. They know we can't afford it. Not now.
So we face big and difficult challenges. And what the American people hope what they deserve is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences; to overcome the numbing weight of our politics. For while the people who sent us here have different backgrounds, different stories and different beliefs, the anxieties they face are the same. The aspirations they hold are shared. A job that pays the bills. A chance to get ahead. Most of all, the ability to give their children a better life.
You know what else they share? They share a stubborn resilience in the face of adversity. After one of the most difficult years in our history, they remain busy building cars and teaching kids; starting businesses and going back to school. They're coaching little league and helping their neighbors. As one woman wrote me, "We are strained but hopeful, struggling but encouraged."
So we face big and difficult challenges. And what the American people hope what they deserve is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences; to overcome the numbing weight of our politics. For while the people who sent us here have different backgrounds, different stories and different beliefs, the anxieties they face are the same. The aspirations they hold are shared. A job that pays the bills. A chance to get ahead. Most of all, the ability to give their children a better life.
So we face big and difficult challenges. And what the American people hope -- what they deserve -- is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences; to overcome the numbing weight of our politics. For while the people who sent us here have different backgrounds, different stories and different beliefs, the anxieties they face are the same. The aspirations they hold are shared. A job that pays the bills. A chance to get ahead. Most of all, the ability to give their children a better life.
You know what else they share? They share a stubborn resilience in the face of adversity. After one of the most difficult years in our history, they remain busy building cars and teaching kids; starting businesses and going back to school. They're coaching little league and helping their neighbors. As one woman wrote me, "We are strained but hopeful, struggling but encouraged."
It is because of this spirit this great decency and great strength -- that I have never been more hopeful about America's future than I am tonight. Despite our hardships, our union is strong. We do not give up. We do not quit. We do not allow fear or division to break our spirit. In this new decade, it's time the American people get a government that matches their decency; that embodies their strength.
And tonight, I'd like to talk about how together, we can deliver on that promise.
It begins with our economy.
Our most urgent task upon taking office was to shore up the same banks that helped cause this crisis. It was not easy to do. And if there's one thing that has unified Democrats and Republicans, it's that we all hated the bank bailout. I hated it. You hated it. It was about as popular as a root canal.
But when I ran for President, I promised I wouldn't just do what was popular I would do what was necessary. And if we had allowed the meltdown of the financial system, unemployment might be double what it is today. More businesses would certainly have closed. More homes would have surely been lost.
So I supported the last administration's efforts to create the financial rescue program. And when we took the program over, we made it more transparent and accountable. As a result, the markets are now stabilized, and we have recovered most of the money we spent on the banks.
To recover the rest, I have proposed a fee on the biggest banks. I know Wall Street isn't keen on this idea, but if these firms can afford to hand out big bonuses again, they can afford a modest fee to pay back the taxpayers who rescued them in their time of need.
As we stabilized the financial system, we also took steps to get our economy growing again, save as many jobs as possible, and help Americans who had become unemployed.
That's why we extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than 18 million Americans; made health insurance 65% cheaper for families who get their coverage through COBRA; and passed 25 different tax cuts.
Let me repeat: we cut taxes. We cut taxes for 95% of working families. We cut taxes for small businesses. We cut taxes for first-time homebuyers. We cut taxes for parents trying to care for their children. We cut taxes for 8 million Americans paying for college. As a result, millions of Americans had more to spend on gas, and food, and other necessities, all of which helped businesses keep more workers. And we haven't raised income taxes by a single dime on a single person. Not a single dime.
Because of the steps we took, there are about two million Americans working right now who would otherwise be unemployed. 200,000 work in construction and clean energy. 300,000 are teachers and other education workers. Tens of thousands are cops, firefighters, correctional officers, and first responders. And we are on track to add another one and a half million jobs to this total by the end of the year.
The plan that has made all of this possible, from the tax cuts to the jobs, is the Recovery Act. That's right the Recovery Act, also known as the Stimulus Bill. Economists on the left and the right say that this bill has helped saved jobs and avert disaster. But you don't have to take their word for it.
Talk to the small business in Phoenix that will triple its workforce because of the Recovery Act.
Talk to the window manufacturer in Philadelphia who said he used to be skeptical about the Recovery Act, until he had to add two more work shifts just because of the business it created.
Talk to the single teacher raising two kids who was told by her principal in the last week of school that because of the Recovery Act, she wouldn't be laid off after all.
There are stories like this all across America. And after two years of recession, the economy is growing again. Retirement funds have started to gain back some of their value. Businesses are beginning to invest again, and slowly some are starting to hire again.
But I realize that for every success story, there are other stories, of men and women who wake up with the anguish of not knowing where their next paycheck will come from; who send out resumes week after week and hear nothing in response. That is why jobs must be our number one focus in 2010, and that is why I am calling for a new jobs bill tonight.
Now, the true engine of job creation in this country will always be America's businesses. But government can create the conditions necessary for businesses to expand and hire more workers.
We should start where most new jobs do in small businesses, companies that begin when an entrepreneur takes a chance on a dream, or a worker decides its time she became her own boss.
Through sheer grit and determination, these companies have weathered the recession and are ready to grow. But when you talk to small business owners in places like Allentown, Pennsylvania or Elyria, Ohio, you find out that even though banks on Wall Street are lending again, they are mostly lending to bigger companies. But financing remains difficult for small business owners across the country.
So tonight, I'm proposing that we take $30 billion of the money Wall Street banks have repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat. I am also proposing a new small business tax credit one that will go to over one million small businesses who hire new workers or raise wages. While we're at it, let's also eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment; and provide a tax incentive for all businesses, large and small, to invest in new plants and equipment.
Next, we can put Americans to work today building the infrastructure of tomorrow. From the first railroads to the interstate highway system, our nation has always been built to compete. There's no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products.
Tomorrow, I'll visit Tampa, Florida, where workers will soon break ground on a new high-speed railroad funded by the Recovery Act. There are projects like that all across this country that will create jobs and help our nation move goods, services, and information. We should put more Americans to work building clean energy facilities, and give rebates to Americans who make their homes more energy efficient, which supports clean energy jobs. And to encourage these and other businesses to stay within our borders, it's time to finally slash the tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs in the United States of America.
The House has passed a jobs bill that includes some of these steps. As the first order of business this year, I urge the Senate to do the same. People are out of work. They are hurting. They need our help. And I want a jobs bill on my desk without delay.
But the truth is, these steps still won't make up for the seven million jobs we've lost over the last two years. The only way to move to full employment is to lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth, and finally address the problems that America's families have confronted for years.
We cannot afford another so-called economic "expansion" like the one from last decade what some call the "lost decade" where jobs grew more slowly than during any prior expansion; where the income of the average American household declined while the cost of health care and tuition reached record highs; where prosperity was built on a housing bubble and financial speculation.
From the day I took office, I have been told that addressing our larger challenges is too ambitious that such efforts would be too contentious, that our political system is too gridlocked, and that we should just put things on hold for awhile.
For those who make these claims, I have one simple question:
How long should we wait? How long should America put its future on hold?
You see, Washington has been telling us to wait for decades, even as the problems have grown worse. Meanwhile, China's not waiting to revamp its economy. Germany's not waiting. India's not waiting. These nations aren't standing still. These nations aren't playing for second place. They're putting more emphasis on math and science. They're rebuilding their infrastructure. They are making serious investments in clean energy because they want those jobs.
Well I do not accept second-place for the United States of America. As hard as it may be, as uncomfortable and contentious as the debates may be, it's time to get serious about fixing the problems that are hampering our growth.
One place to start is serious financial reform. Look, I am not interested in punishing banks, I'm interested in protecting our economy. A strong, healthy financial market makes it possible for businesses to access credit and create new jobs. It channels the savings of families into investments that raise incomes. But that can only happen if we guard against the same recklessness that nearly brought down our entire economy.
We need to make sure consumers and middle-class families have the information they need to make financial decisions. We can't allow financial institutions, including those that take your deposits, to take risks that threaten the whole economy.
The House has already passed financial reform with many of these changes. And the lobbyists are already trying to kill it. Well, we cannot let them win this fight. And if the bill that ends up on my desk does not meet the test of real reform, I will send it back.
Next, we need to encourage American innovation. Last year, we made the largest investment in basic research funding in history an investment that could lead to the world's cheapest solar cells or treatment that kills cancer cells but leaves healthy ones untouched. And no area is more ripe for such innovation than energy. You can see the results of last year's investment in clean energy in the North Carolina company that will create 1200 jobs nationwide helping to make advanced batteries; or in the California business that will put 1,000 people to work making solar panels.
But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. That means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development. It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies. And yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America.
I am grateful to the House for passing such a bill last year. This year, I am eager to help advance the bipartisan effort in the Senate. I know there have been questions about whether we can afford such changes in a tough economy; and I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change. But even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy. And America must be that nation.
Third, we need to export more of our goods. Because the more products we make and sell to other countries, the more jobs we support right here in America. So tonight, we set a new goal: We will double our exports over the next five years, an increase that will support two million jobs in America. To help meet this goal, we're launching a National Export Initiative that will help farmers and small businesses increase their exports, and reform export controls consistent with national security.
We have to seek new markets aggressively, just as our competitors are. If America sits on the sidelines while other nations sign trade deals, we will lose the chance to create jobs on our shores. But realizing those benefits also means enforcing those agreements so our trading partners play by the rules. And that's why we will continue to shape a Doha trade agreement that opens global markets, and why we will strengthen our trade relations in Asia and with key partners like South Korea, Panama, and Colombia.
Fourth, we need to invest in the skills and education of our people.
This year, we have broken through the stalemate between left and right by launching a national competition to improve our schools. The idea here is simple: instead of rewarding failure, we only reward success. Instead of funding the status quo, we only invest in reform reform that raises student achievement, inspires students to excel in math and science, and turns around failing schools that steal the future of too many young Americans, from rural communities to inner-cities. In the 21st century, one of the best anti-poverty programs is a world-class education. In this country, the success of our children cannot depend more on where they live than their potential.
When we renew the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, we will work with Congress to expand these reforms to all fifty states. Still, in this economy, a high school diploma no longer guarantees a good job. I urge the Senate to follow the House and pass a bill that will revitalize our community colleges, which are a career pathway to the children of so many working families. To make college more affordable, this bill will finally end the unwarranted taxpayer-subsidies that go to banks for student loans. Instead, let's take that money and give families a $10,000 tax credit for four years of college and increase Pell Grants. And let's tell another one million students that when they graduate, they will be required to pay only ten percent of their income on student loans, and all of their debt will be forgiven after twenty years and forgiven after ten years if they choose a career in public service. Because in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they chose to go to college. And it's time for colleges and universities to get serious about cutting their own costs because they too have a responsibility to help solve this problem.
Now, the price of college tuition is just one of the burdens facing the middle-class. That's why last year I asked Vice President Biden to chair a task force on Middle-Class Families. That's why we're nearly doubling the child care tax credit, and making it easier to save for retirement by giving every worker access to a retirement account and expanding the tax credit for those who start a nest egg. That's why we're working to lift the value of a family's single largest investment their home. The steps we took last year to shore up the housing market have allowed millions of Americans to take out new loans and save an average of $1,500 on mortgage payments. This year, we will step up re-financing so that homeowners can move into more affordable mortgages. And it is precisely to relieve the burden on middle-class families that we still need health insurance reform.
Now let's be clear -- I did not choose to tackle this issue to get some legislative victory under my belt. And by now it should be fairly obvious that I didn't take on health care because it was good politics.
I took on health care because of the stories I've heard from Americans with pre-existing conditions whose lives depend on getting coverage; patients who've been denied coverage; and families even those with insurance who are just one illness away from financial ruin.
After nearly a century of trying, we are closer than ever to bringing more security to the lives of so many Americans. The approach we've taken would protect every American from the worst practices of the insurance industry. It would give small businesses and uninsured Americans a chance to choose an affordable health care plan in a competitive market. It would require every insurance plan to cover preventive care. And by the way, I want to acknowledge our First Lady, Michelle Obama, who this year is creating a national movement to tackle the epidemic of childhood obesity and make our kids healthier.
Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan. It would reduce costs and premiums for millions of families and businesses. And according to the Congressional Budget Office -- the independent organization that both parties have cited as the official scorekeeper for Congress -- our approach would bring down the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades.

Still, this is a complex issue, and the longer it was debated, the more skeptical people became. I take my share of the blame for not explaining it more clearly to the American people. And I know that with all the lobbying and horse-trading, this process left most Americans wondering what's in it for them.
But I also know this problem is not going away. By the time I'm finished speaking tonight, more Americans will have lost their health insurance. Millions will lose it this year. Our deficit will grow. Premiums will go up. Patients will be denied the care they need. Small business owners will continue to drop coverage altogether. I will not walk away from these Americans, and neither should the people in this chamber.

As temperatures cool, I want everyone to take another look at the plan we've proposed. There's a reason why many doctors, nurses, and health care experts who know our system best consider this approach a vast improvement over the status quo. But if anyone from either party has a better approach that will bring down premiums, bring down the deficit, cover the uninsured, strengthen Medicare for seniors, and stop insurance company abuses, let me know. Here's what I ask of Congress, though: Do not walk away from reform. Not now. Not when we are so close. Let us find a way to come together and finish the job for the American people.
Now, even as health care reform would reduce our deficit, it's not enough to dig us out of a massive fiscal hole in which we find ourselves. It's a challenge that makes all others that much harder to solve, and one that's been subject to a lot of political posturing.
So let me start the discussion of government spending by setting the record straight. At the beginning of the last decade, America had a budget surplus of over $200 billion. By the time I took office, we had a one year deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade. Most of this was the result of not paying for two wars, two tax cuts, and an expensive prescription drug program. On top of that, the effects of the recession put a $3 trillion hole in our budget. That was before I walked in the door.
Now if we had taken office in ordinary times, I would have liked nothing more than to start bringing down the deficit. But we took office amid a crisis, and our efforts to prevent a second Depression have added another $1 trillion to our national debt.
I am absolutely convinced that was the right thing to do. But families across the country are tightening their belts and making tough decisions. The federal government should do the same. So tonight, I'm proposing specific steps to pay for the $1 trillion that it took to rescue the economy last year.
Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected. But all other discretionary government programs will. Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don't. And if I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will.
We will continue to go through the budget line by line to eliminate programs that we can't afford and don't work. We've already identified $20 billion in savings for next year. To help working families, we will extend our middle-class tax cuts. But at a time of record deficits, we will not continue tax cuts for oil companies, investment fund managers, and those making over $250,000 a year. We just can't afford it.
Now, even after paying for what we spent on my watch, we will still face the massive deficit we had when I took office. More importantly, the cost of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will continue to skyrocket. That's why I've called for a bipartisan, Fiscal Commission, modeled on a proposal by Republican Judd Gregg and Democrat Kent Conrad. This can't be one of those Washington gimmicks that lets us pretend we solved a problem. The Commission will have to provide a specific set of solutions by a certain deadline. Yesterday, the Senate blocked a bill that would have created this commission. So I will issue an executive order that will allow us to go forward, because I refuse to pass this problem on to another generation of Americans. And when the vote comes tomorrow, the Senate should restore the pay-as-you-go law that was a big reason why we had record surpluses in the 1990s.
I know that some in my own party will argue that we cannot address the deficit or freeze government spending when so many are still hurting. I agree, which is why this freeze will not take effect until next year, when the economy is stronger. But understand if we do not take meaningful steps to rein in our debt, it could damage our markets, increase the cost of borrowing, and jeopardize our recovery all of which could have an even worse effect on our job growth and family incomes.
From some on the right, I expect we'll hear a different argument -- that if we just make fewer investments in our people, extend tax cuts for wealthier Americans, eliminate more regulations, and maintain the status quo on health care, our deficits will go away. The problem is, that's what we did for eight years. That's what helped lead us into this crisis. It's what helped lead to these deficits. And we cannot do it again.

Rather than fight the same tired battles that have dominated Washington for decades, it's time to try something new. Let's invest in our people without leaving them a mountain of debt. Let's meet our responsibility to the citizens who sent us here. Let's try common sense.
To do that, we have to recognize that we face more than a deficit of dollars right now. We face a deficit of trust deep and corrosive doubts about how Washington works that have been growing for years. To close that credibility gap we must take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue to end the outsized influence of lobbyists; to do our work openly; and to give our people the government they deserve.
That's what I came to Washington to do. That's why for the first time in history my Administration posts our White House visitors online. And that's why we've excluded lobbyists from policy-making jobs or seats on federal boards and commissions.
But we can't stop there. It's time to require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my Administration or Congress. And it's time to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office. Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests including foreign corporations to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that's why I'm urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.
I'm also calling on Congress to continue down the path of earmark reform. You have trimmed some of this spending and embraced some meaningful change. But restoring the public trust demands more. For example, some members of Congress post some earmark requests online. Tonight, I'm calling on Congress to publish all earmark requests on a single website before there's a vote so that the American people can see how their money is being spent.
Of course, none of these reforms will even happen if we don't also reform how we work with one another.
Now, I am not naïve. I never thought the mere fact of my election would usher in peace, harmony, and some post-partisan era. I knew that both parties have fed divisions that are deeply entrenched. And on some issues, there are simply philosophical differences that will always cause us to part ways. These disagreements, about the role of government in our lives, about our national priorities and our national security, have been taking place for over two hundred years. They are the very essence of our democracy.
But what frustrates the American people is a Washington where every day is Election Day. We cannot wage a perpetual campaign where the only goal is to see who can get the most embarrassing headlines about their opponent a belief that if you lose, I win. Neither party should delay or obstruct every single bill just because they can. The confirmation of well-qualified public servants should not be held hostage to the pet projects or grudges of a few individual Senators. Washington may think that saying anything about the other side, no matter how false, is just part of the game. But it is precisely such politics that has stopped either party from helping the American people. Worse yet, it is sowing further division among our citizens and further distrust in our government.
So no, I will not give up on changing the tone of our politics. I know it's an election year. And after last week, it is clear that campaign fever has come even earlier than usual. But we still need to govern. To Democrats, I would remind you that we still have the largest majority in decades, and the people expect us to solve some problems, not run for the hills. And if the Republican leadership is going to insist that sixty votes in the Senate are required to do any business at all in this town, then the responsibility to govern is now yours as well. Just saying no to everything may be good short-term politics, but it's not leadership. We were sent here to serve our citizens, not our ambitions. So let's show the American people that we can do it together. This week, I'll be addressing a meeting of the House Republicans. And I would like to begin monthly meetings with both the Democratic and Republican leadership. I know you can't wait.
Throughout our history, no issue has united this country more than our security. Sadly, some of the unity we felt after 9/11 has dissipated. We can argue all we want about who's to blame for this, but I am not interested in re-litigating the past. I know that all of us love this country. All of us are committed to its defense. So let's put aside the schoolyard taunts about who is tough. Let's reject the false choice between protecting our people and upholding our values. Let's leave behind the fear and division, and do what it takes to defend our nation and forge a more hopeful future for America and the world.
That is the work we began last year. Since the day I took office, we have renewed our focus on the terrorists who threaten our nation. We have made substantial investments in our homeland security and disrupted plots that threatened to take American lives. We are filling unacceptable gaps revealed by the failed Christmas attack, with better airline security, and swifter action on our intelligence. We have prohibited torture and strengthened partnerships from the Pacific to South Asia to the Arabian Peninsula. And in the last year, hundreds of Al Qaeda's fighters and affiliates, including many senior leaders, have been captured or killed far more than in 2008.
In Afghanistan, we are increasing our troops and training Afghan Security Forces so they can begin to take the lead in July of 2011, and our troops can begin to come home. We will reward good governance, reduce corruption, and support the rights of all Afghans men and women alike. We are joined by allies and partners who have increased their own commitment, and who will come together tomorrow in London to reaffirm our common purpose. There will be difficult days ahead. But I am confident we will succeed.
As we take the fight to al Qaeda, we are responsibly leaving Iraq to its people. As a candidate, I promised that I would end this war, and that is what I am doing as President. We will have all of our combat troops out of Iraq by the end of this August. We will support the Iraqi government as they hold elections, and continue to partner with the Iraqi people to promote regional peace and prosperity. But make no mistake: this war is ending, and all of our troops are coming home.
Tonight, all of our men and women in uniform -- in Iraq, Afghanistan, and around the world must know that they have our respect, our gratitude, and our full support. And just as they must have the resources they need in war, we all have a responsibility to support them when they come home. That is why we made the largest increase in investments for veterans in decades. That is why we are building a 21st century VA. And that is why Michelle has joined with Jill Biden to forge a national commitment to support military families.
Even as we prosecute two wars, we are also confronting perhaps the greatest danger to the American people the threat of nuclear weapons. I have embraced the vision of John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan through a strategy that reverses the spread of these weapons, and seeks a world without them. To reduce our stockpiles and launchers, while ensuring our deterrent, the United States and Russia are completing negotiations on the farthest-reaching arms control treaty in nearly two decades. And at April's Nuclear Security Summit, we will bring forty-four nations together behind a clear goal: securing all vulnerable nuclear materials around the world in four years, so that they never fall into the hands of terrorists.
These diplomatic efforts have also strengthened our hand in dealing with those nations that insist on violating international agreements in pursuit of these weapons. That is why North Korea now faces increased isolation, and stronger sanctions sanctions that are being vigorously enforced. That is why the international community is more united, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is more isolated. And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: they, too, will face growing consequences.
That is the leadership that we are providing -- engagement that advances the common security and prosperity of all people. We are working through the G-20 to sustain a lasting global recovery. We are working with Muslim communities around the world to promote science, education and innovation. We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change. We are helping developing countries to feed themselves, and continuing the fight against HIV/AIDS. And we are launching a new initiative that will give us the capacity to respond faster and more effectively to bio-terrorism or an infectious disease a plan that will counter threats at home, and strengthen public health abroad.
As we have for over sixty years, America takes these actions because our destiny is connected to those beyond our shores. But we also do it because it is right. That is why, as we meet here tonight, over 10,000 Americans are working with many nations to help the people of Haiti recover and rebuild. That is why we stand with the girl who yearns to go to school in Afghanistan; we support the human rights of the women marching through the streets of Iran; and we advocate for the young man denied a job by corruption in Guinea. For America must always stand on the side of freedom and human dignity.
Abroad, America's greatest source of strength has always been our ideals. The same is true at home. We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal, that no matter who you are or what you look like, if you abide by the law you should be protected by it; that if you adhere to our common values you should be treated no different than anyone else.
We must continually renew this promise. My Administration has a Civil Rights Division that is once again prosecuting civil rights violations and employment discrimination. We finally strengthened our laws to protect against crimes driven by hate. This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are. We are going to crack down on violations of equal pay laws so that women get equal pay for an equal day's work. And we should continue the work of fixing our broken immigration system to secure our borders, enforce our laws, and ensure that everyone who plays by the rules can contribute to our economy and enrich our nations.
In the end, it is our ideals, our values, that built America -- values that allowed us to forge a nation made up of immigrants from every corner of the globe; values that drive our citizens still. Every day, Americans meet their responsibilities to their families and their employers. Time and again, they lend a hand to their neighbors and give back to their country. They take pride in their labor, and are generous in spirit. These aren't Republican values or Democratic values they're living by; business values or labor values. They are American values.
Unfortunately, too many of our citizens have lost faith that our biggest institutions -- our corporations, our media, and yes, our government -- still reflect these same values. Each of these institutions are full of honorable men and women doing important work that helps our country prosper. But each time a CEO rewards himself for failure, or a banker puts the rest of us at risk for his own selfish gain, people's doubts grow. Each time lobbyists game the system or politicians tear each other down instead of lifting this country up, we lose faith. The more that TV pundits reduce serious debates into silly arguments, and big issues into sound bites, our citizens turn away.
No wonder there's so much cynicism out there.
No wonder there's so much disappointment.
I campaigned on the promise of change change we can believe in, the slogan went. And right now, I know there are many Americans who aren't sure if they still believe we can change or at least, that I can deliver it.
But remember this I never suggested that change would be easy, or that I can do it alone. Democracy in a nation of three hundred million people can be noisy and messy and complicated. And when you try to do big things and make big changes, it stirs passions and controversy. That's just how it is.
Those of us in public office can respond to this reality by playing it safe and avoid telling hard truths. We can do what's necessary to keep our poll numbers high, and get through the next election instead of doing what's best for the next generation.
But I also know this: if people had made that decision fifty years ago or one hundred years ago or two hundred years ago, we wouldn't be here tonight. The only reason we are is because generations of Americans were unafraid to do what was hard; to do what was needed even when success was uncertain; to do what it took to keep the dream of this nation alive for their children and grandchildren.
Our administration has had some political setbacks this year, and some of them were deserved. But I wake up every day knowing that they are nothing compared to the setbacks that families all across this country have faced this year. And what keeps me going what keeps me fighting is that despite all these setbacks, that spirit of determination and optimism that fundamental decency that has always been at the core of the American people lives on.
It lives on in the struggling small business owner who wrote to me of his company, "None of us," he said, "are willing to consider, even slightly, that we might fail."
It lives on in the woman who said that even though she and her neighbors have felt the pain of recession, "We are strong. We are resilient. We are American."
It lives on in the 8-year old boy in Louisiana, who just sent me his allowance and asked if I would give it to the people of Haiti. And it lives on in all the Americans who've dropped everything to go some place they've never been and pull people they've never known from rubble, prompting chants of "U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A!" when another life was saved.
The spirit that has sustained this nation for more than two centuries lives on in you, its people.
We have finished a difficult year. We have come through a difficult decade. But a new year has come. A new decade stretches before us. We don't quit. I don't quit. Let's seize this moment to start anew, to carry the dream forward, and to strengthen our union once more.
Thank you. God Bless You. And God Bless the United States of America.


[관련키워드]

[뉴스핌 베스트 기사]

사진
[2026 대전망] '달러 시대의 느린 균열' [시드니=뉴스핌] 권지언 특파원 = 2026년 글로벌 자산시장 지형은 조용하지만 분명하게 바뀔 모양새다. 월가 주요 IB와 글로벌 운용사들이 제시한 내년 전망을 종합하면, 핵심 키워드는 ▲약해지는 달러 ▲강해지는 금 ▲제도권에 깊숙이 편입되는 코인 ▲전략자산으로 격상된 원자재로 압축된다. 기축통화로서 달러의 지위는 유지되지만, 각종 정책·재정·지정학 리스크로 인해 달러 의존도를 낮추는 '조용한 탈출(quiet hedging)'이 진행 중이라는 분석이다. [사진=퍼플렉시티 생성 이미지] ◆ 달러: 패권은 유지되지만 '천천히 새는 배' 2026년 달러를 둘러싼 큰 그림은 '완만한 약세' 흐름 속에서, 기축통화 패권은 유지하되 매력은 서서히 떨어지는 구조다. 여기에 연준의 금리 인하 경로, 주요국과의 금리 격차, 글로벌 성장·정책 리스크, 그리고 디달러라이제이션(de-dollarization, 탈달) 흐름이 겹치며 달러의 방향성을 좌우할 전망이다. 먼저 연준의 완화 경로를 살펴보면, 2026년 말 기준금리는 약 3%대 중반(3.4% 안팎)까지 내려갈 것이란 전망이 우세하다. 다만 최근 발언들을 종합하면 인하 속도는 초기 시장 기대보다 더 느리고 신중한 방향으로 조정되고 있어, 지나친 달러 약세를 막아주는 '하방 안전판' 역할을 하고 있다는 평가다. 둘째는 금리 격차다. 연준이 금리를 내리더라도, 정책금리는 유럽중앙은행(ECB)의 2%, 영란은행(BoE)의 2~3% 수준보다 여전히 높은 수준이 유지될 것으로 예상된다. 수익률 격차가 과거만큼 크지는 않지만, 달러 자산이 어느 정도 금리 메리트를 제공하는 만큼 "달러가 한 방향으로 급락하는 구도"까지 보긴 어렵다는 진단이다. 이 같은 상대 금리 우위는 2026년 내내 달러가 급격히 무너지는 것을 막는 완충장치로 작용할 수 있다. 셋째는 글로벌 성장과 정책 리스크다. IMF는 2026년 세계 경제가 완만하게 성장세를 개선할 것으로 보고 있어, 극단적인 안전자산 선호가 달러로만 몰리는 환경은 아닐 것이라는 전망에 힘이 실린다. 다만 미국의 정치·재정 이슈, 부채한도·재정적자, 무역·관세 정책을 둘러싼 불확실성은 여전히 "달러 방향성을 뒤흔들 수 있는 변수"로 남아 있으며, 상황에 따라 달러에 일시적인 강세·약세 충격을 모두 줄 수 있는 요인들이다. 장기 구조 측면에서 보면, 달러는 '패권은 유지되지만, 천천히 새는 배'에 가깝다. BNY멜론, JP모간, UBS, 냇웨스트, 피델리티 등 주요 글로벌 하우스들은 공통적으로 "달러의 기축통화 지위는 당분간 흔들리지 않는다"는 데 의견을 같이한다. 그러나 무역정책 불확실성, 미국의 재정적자 확대, 연준의 완화적 기조 등 구조적 요인들이 달러의 매력을 조금씩 갉아먹는 국면으로 진입했다는 데도 큰 이견이 없다. 국제통화기금(IMF) 통계에 따르면 전 세계 외환보유액에서 달러 비중은 2000년대 초반 70%대에서 2025년 2분기 56% 수준까지 떨어졌다. 냇웨스트와 피델리티는 이 흐름을 "빠르진 않지만 분명한 디달러라이제이션(de-dollarization)"으로 규정한다. 특히 러시아 준비자산 동결 이후 커진 '제재 리스크'는 여러 국가가 결제·준비자산을 다변화하도록 자극한 대표적 계기로 지목되며, 일부 중앙은행은 준비자산 구성에서 달러 비중을 줄이고 금·기타 통화 비중을 확대하는 방향으로 움직이고 있다. 이런 전제 아래에서 보면 달러는 2026년 전반적으로는 약세 쪽으로 기울지만, 중간중간 강한 반등(숏 커버 랠리)이 나올 수 있다는 시나리오가 설득력을 얻는다. 물가가 예상보다 끈질기게 높은 수준을 유지하거나 예상 밖의 인플레이션 급등이 나타날 경우 연준의 추가 인하가 지연되면서 달러에 단기적인 지지 요인으로 작용할 수 있다. 여기에 지정학적 충돌, 금융시장 급락 같은 글로벌 리스크오프 이벤트가 겹치면 '안전자산 달러' 선호가 살아나면서 강세 국면이 일시적으로 재현될 가능성도 크다. 시장에서는 이 같은 조건이 맞아떨어질 수 있는 시점을 2026년 3~6월 구간으로 보는 시각이 적지 않다. 연준의 주요 회의와 핵심 물가·고용 지표 발표가 몰려 있는 만큼, 상반기 중 일정 구간에서는 "완만한 약세 추세 속 달러 반등 구간"이 열릴 수 있다는 전망이다. 결국 2026년 달러는 방향성으로는 완만한 약세, 경로상으로는 구간별 반등이 섞인 '요철 있는 하향 곡선'에 가까운 그림으로 그려지고 있다. 달러지수 내년 전망 [사진=캠브리지 커런시스] ◆ 금: 탈달러·재정악화·지정학이 만든 '슈퍼 헤지' 월가 IB들이 그리는 2026년 금 가격의 큰 그림은 '상승'에서 '초강세'까지, 방향성이 한쪽으로 모여 있다. JP모간은 2025년 말 온스당 3,600달러대에서 2026년에는 4,000달러를 넘어설 수 있다는 전망을 내놓고, 일부 프라이빗 뷰에서는 5,000달러 안팎까지 거론한다. 골드만삭스·UBS 등도 4,000~4,500달러 구간을 기본 밴드로 제시하면서, 구조적 강세장이 이어질 경우 5,000달러 돌파 가능성까지 열어두는 분위기다. 이 같은 '슈퍼 헤지' 논리는 세 축에 기대고 있다. 첫째, 중앙은행의 공격적인 금 매수와 디달러라이제이션 흐름이다. 러시아 준비자산 동결 이후 "제재로 묶이지 않는 준비자산"을 찾는 움직임이 강화되면서, 다수 중앙은행이 외환보유액에서 달러·유로 비중을 줄이고 금 비중을 늘리는 방향으로 서서히 포트폴리오를 바꾸고 있다. 둘째, 미국을 비롯한 글로벌 재정악화와 부채 누적이다. 천문학적 정부부채와 확대된 재정적자는 통화가치 희석 우려를 키우며 "법정통화의 거울"로서 금의 역할을 다시 부각시키고 있다. 셋째, 연준의 완화 전환과 약달러 구도다. 금리가 내려가면 무이자 자산인 금의 기회비용이 줄고, 달러 약세는 달러 표시 금 가격을 끌어올리는 이중 효과를 낳는다. 기관투자가들의 인식도 이를 뒷받침한다. 나티시스 설문에서 글로벌 기관의 3분의 2는 "2026년에는 금이 코인보다 더 나은 성과를 낼 것"이라고 답하며 금을 1순위 방어자산으로 꼽았다. 동시에 상당수 기관이 전통적인 60:40 포트폴리오 대신 인프라·부동산·원자재·금 등을 섞은 60:20:20 구조를 선호한다고 응답해, 금과 실물자산을 "인플레이션·재정·지정학 리스크가 겹친 시대의 전략자산"으로 재평가하고 있음을 보여준다. 다만 IB들은 2025년 급등 뒤 2026년 일부 구간에서 단기 조정과 높은 변동성은 불가피하다고 보면서도, 조정이 나오더라도 "고점을 한 단계 올리는 조정"이라는 표현을 쓰며 중장기 방향성만큼은 강하게 위를 가리키고 있다. ◆ 코인: '대체 가치 저장 수단'...그러나 여전히 '실험 구역' 코인에 대한 월가의 시각은 한 줄로 "커진 건 맞지만, 아직은 실험 구역"이다. JP모간은 비트코인을 포함한 디지털 자산을 "달러에 대한 또 하나의 도전자"라고 부르면서도, 극단적인 변동성과 짧은 히스토리를 이유로 전략적 코어 자산이 아니라 위성(satellite) 성격의 위험자산으로 다뤄야 한다고 경고한다. 2024년 초 2조달러 수준이던 크립토 전체 시가총액이 2025년에는 4조달러 안팎까지 불어난 가운데, 규제 환경이 ETF·ETP 승인 등으로 제도권 친화적으로 바뀌며 비트코인을 '가치 저장 수단'으로 보는 시각이 늘고 있는 것도 사실이다. 다만 실제 결제·상거래 규모는 여전히 수백억 달러 수준에 머물며, 일상적 화폐나 결제 인프라로서의 역할은 초기 단계라는 점이 반복해서 지적된다.​ UBS와 같은 보수적인 하우스는 이런 변화를 인정하면서도 "코인은 어디까지나 투기적 자산"이라는 입장을 고수한다. UBS CIO는 비트코인 변동성이 연 70~80% 수준으로 전통 자산 대비 현저히 높고, 70% 이상 급락하는 대형 조정이 여러 차례 반복된 탓에 포트폴리오의 전략적 축으로 편입하긴 어렵다고 본다. 대신 장기 잠재력을 믿는 투자자라면 "완전 손실이 나도 전체 계획이 흔들리지 않을 정도의 극소 비중으로, 장기 보유하는 전략" 정도만 고려하라고 조언한다. 반대로 SSGA나 모간스탠리, 반에크 등 디지털 자산에 우호적인 기관들은 비트코인이 전통 자산과의 상관관계가 낮고 장기 위험조정 수익이 높다는 점을 들어, 1~4% 수준의 소규모 전략적 배분이 포트폴리오 다변화에 기여할 수 있다는 분석을 내놓는다.​ 기관 머니의 온도차도 뚜렷하다. 나티시스 2026 인스티튜셔널 서베이에 따르면 글로벌 기관의 36%는 향후 크립토 투자 비중을 늘릴 계획이라고 답하지만, 동시에 66%는 "2026년 성과는 금이 크립토를 이길 것"이라고 응답했다. EY·코인베이스가 2025년 초 실시한 설문에서도 응답 기관의 59%가 "AUM의 5% 이상을 디지털 자산에 배분할 계획"이라고 답해 성장 잠재력을 보여줬지만, 가장 큰 우려 요인으로 여전히 변동성과 규제 리스크를 꼽았다. ◆ 원자재: AI·에너지 전환·안보가 만든 '전략자산'의 귀환 2026년 원자재 시장은 더 이상 단순한 인플레이션 헤지가 아니라, AI·에너지 전환·안보 이슈가 맞물린 '전략자산'으로 재조명되고 있다. BNY멜론, JP모간, UBS, 냇웨스트, 피델리티 리포트는 접근법은 조금씩 다르지만, 공통적으로 원자재·에너지·전환 메탈에 구조적인 강세 요인이 집중되고 있다는 점을 강조한다. BNY멜론은 AI 데이터센터 구축, 전력 인프라 확충, 에너지 전환과 함께 각국의 방위·인프라 지출이 향후 수년간 원자재 수요를 떠받칠 것이라고 본다. JP모간은 천연가스와 전력을 "AI 혁명의 병목(bottleneck)"으로 규정하며 가스 발전, LNG 프로젝트, 송전망 등에 장기 투자 기회가 많다고 짚었다. UBS는 구리·알루미늄 등 산업금속 비중 확대를, 냇웨스트는 희토류·전략자원이 '공급망 안보'와 직결되면서 지정학적 중요성이 커질 것이라고 제시하고, 피델리티는 구조적으로 높은 인플레이션 환경에서 실물자산·절대수익 전략이 전통 60:40 포트폴리오의 필수 보완재가 된다고 분석했다. 나티시스 설문에서도 기관투자가의 65%가 전통 60:40 대신 인프라·부동산·원자재·금 등을 섞은 60:20:20 구조가 2026년에 더 높은 수익을 낼 것이라고 답해, 원자재·실물자산을 '필수 축'으로 보는 인식 전환이 확인된다.​ 블룸버그NEF와 IEA 자료를 인용한 보고서들은 AI 데이터센터와 전력망 확충 수요만으로도 2030년까지 전 세계 구리 수요의 2~3%포인트 추가 상향을 가져올 수 있다고 추정한다. AI 데이터센터는 단일 시설당 수만 톤 단위의 구리와 막대한 전력을 소모하는 만큼, 이미 공급 부족이 우려되는 구리·은·희토류·갈륨 등 핵심 금속 시장에 추가적인 타이트닝 요인으로 작용할 수 있다는 것이다. 여기에 전기차·배터리·재생에너지 확대로 리튬·니켈·코발트 등 전환 메탈 수요가 2026년 한 해에만 30~40% 급증할 수 있다는 전망도 나오고 있어, 에너지 전환과 AI가 결합된 새로운 '미니 슈퍼사이클' 가능성이 거론된다.​ 인플레이션·무역·정책 측면에서의 환경도 원자재에 우호적이다. 모간스탠리 등은 미국·유럽에서 관세·보호무역 정책이 상수로 남는 한, 명목 물가가 2%를 상회하는 기간이 길어질 수 있다고 경고하면서, 과거 데이터상 인플레이션이 2%를 넘는 구간에서 원자재 상품 수익률이 평균적으로 기타 자산 대비 20%포인트가량 우위였다고 지적했다. 동시에 에너지 안보 우려와 탄소 규제가 섞이면서, 가스·LNG·원유·우라늄은 "절대 줄일 수 없는 베이스 에너지"로, 구리·알루미늄·리튬·희토류는 "에너지 전환을 위한 전략 금속"으로 포지셔닝이 재정의되고 있다. 이런 환경 속에서 월가 IB와 기관투자가들은 2026년 포트폴리오에서 원자재 비중을 한 단계 높이는 전략을, "달러·채권·전통 주식만으로는 감당하기 어려운 에너지·인플레이션·안보 리스크를 헷지하는 가장 실질적인 방법"으로 제시했다. kwonjiun@newspim.com 2025-12-15 07:12
사진
李대통령, 전재수 장관 면직안 재가 [서울=뉴스핌] 박찬제 기자 = 이재명 대통령이 11일 '통일교 금품수수' 의혹을 받는 전재수 해양수산부 장관에 대한 면직안을 재가했다. 대통령실 대변인실은 이날 오후 언론 공지를 통해 "이재명 대통령은 전재수 해양수산부 장관에 대한 면직안을 재가했다"고 밝혔다. [영종도=뉴스핌] 김학선 기자 = 통일교로부터 금품을 받았다는 의혹이 제기된 전재수 해양수산부 장관이 11일 오전 'UN해양총회' 유치 활동을 마친 후 인천국제공항 제2여객터미널을 통해 귀국해 입장을 밝힌 후 공항을 나서고 있다. 전 장관은 "직을 내려놓고 허위사실 의혹을 밝힐 것"이라고 밝혔다. 2025.12.11 yooksa@newspim.com 통일교 측으로부터 금품을 받았다는 의혹이 불거진 전 장관은 앞서 "장관직을 내려놓고 당당하게 응하는 것이 공직자로서 해야 할 처신"이라며 사의를 표명했다. 전 장관은 이날 오전 인천국제공항으로 입국하면서 기자들과 만나 '통일교 금품 수수 의혹'에 대해 "전혀 사실무근"이라면서도 사의를 밝혔다. 그는 "흔들림 없이 일할 수 있도록 제가 해수부 장관직을 내려놓는 것이 온당하지 않을까 생각한다"고 밝혔다. 전 장관은 의혹에 대해 "전혀 사실무근이고, 불법적인 금품수수는 단언컨대 없었다"며 "추후 수사 형태든지, 아니면 제가 여러 가지 것들 종합해서 국민들께 말씀드리거나 기자간담회를 통해 밝혀질 것"이라고 강조했다. 전 장관은 "(통일교 측으로부터)10원짜리 하나 불법적으로 받은 사실이 없다"면서 "600명이 모인 장소에서 축사를 했다는 것도 사실무근"이라고 반박했다. 앞서 민중기 특별검사팀은 지난 8월 윤영호 전 통일교 세계본부장으로부터 2018∼2020년께 전재수 당시 더불어민주당 의원에게 명품 시계 2개와 함께 수천만 원을 제공했다는 취지로 진술한 것으로 전해졌다. 그러면서 한일 해저터널 추진 등 교단 숙원사업 청탁성이라고 설명한 것으로 알려졌다. pcjay@newspim.com 2025-12-11 17:14
기사 번역
결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.
종목 추적기

S&P 500 기업 중 기사 내용이 영향을 줄 종목 추적

결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.

긍정 영향 종목

  • Lockheed Martin Corp. Industrials
    우크라이나 안보 지원 강화 기대감으로 방산 수요 증가 직접적. 미·러 긴장 완화 불확실성 속에서도 방위산업 매출 안정성 강화 예상됨.

부정 영향 종목

  • Caterpillar Inc. Industrials
    우크라이나 전쟁 장기화 시 건설 및 중장비 수요 불확실성 직접적. 글로벌 인프라 투자 지연으로 매출 성장 둔화 가능성 있음.
이 내용에 포함된 데이터와 의견은 뉴스핌 AI가 분석한 결과입니다. 정보 제공 목적으로만 작성되었으며, 특정 종목 매매를 권유하지 않습니다. 투자 판단 및 결과에 대한 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다. 주식 투자는 원금 손실 가능성이 있으므로, 투자 전 충분한 조사와 전문가 상담을 권장합니다.
안다쇼핑
Top으로 이동