전체기사 최신뉴스 GAM
KYD 디데이
글로벌

속보

더보기

오바마 연두교서 전문(영문)

기사입력 :

최종수정 :

※ 본문 글자 크기 조정

  • 더 작게
  • 작게
  • 보통
  • 크게
  • 더 크게

※ 번역할 언어 선택

The State of the Union Wednesday, January 27, 2009 Washington, DC

Madame Speaker, Vice President Biden, Members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:
Our Constitution declares that from time to time, the President shall give to Congress information about the state of our union. For two hundred and twenty years, our leaders have fulfilled this duty. They have done so during periods of prosperity and tranquility. And they have done so in the midst of war and depression; at moments of great strife and great struggle.
It's tempting to look back on these moments and assume that our progress was inevitable that America was always destined to succeed. But when the Union was turned back at Bull Run and the Allies first landed at Omaha Beach, victory was very much in doubt. When the market crashed on Black Tuesday and civil rights marchers were beaten on Bloody Sunday, the future was anything but certain. These were times that tested the courage of our convictions, and the strength of our union. And despite all our divisions and disagreements; our hesitations and our fears; America prevailed because we chose to move forward as one nation, and one people.
Again, we are tested. And again, we must answer history's call.
One year ago, I took office amid two wars, an economy rocked by severe recession, a financial system on the verge of collapse, and a government deeply in debt. Experts from across the political spectrum warned that if we did not act, we might face a second depression. So we acted immediately and aggressively. And one year later, the worst of the storm has passed.
But the devastation remains. One in ten Americans still cannot find work. Many businesses have shuttered. Home values have declined. Small towns and rural communities have been hit especially hard. For those who had already known poverty, life has become that much harder.
This recession has also compounded the burdens that America's families have been dealing with for decades the burden of working harder and longer for less; of being unable to save enough to retire or help kids with college.
So I know the anxieties that are out there right now. They're not new. These struggles are the reason I ran for President. These struggles are what I've witnessed for years in places like Elkhart, Indiana and Galesburg, Illinois. I hear about them in the letters that I read each night. The toughest to read are those written by children asking why they have to move from their home, or when their mom or dad will be able to go back to work.
For these Americans and so many others, change has not come fast enough. Some are frustrated; some are angry. They don't understand why it seems like bad behavior on Wall Street is rewarded but hard work on Main Street isn't; or why Washington has been unable or unwilling to solve any of our problems. They are tired of the partisanship and the shouting and the pettiness. They know we can't afford it. Not now.
So we face big and difficult challenges. And what the American people hope what they deserve is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences; to overcome the numbing weight of our politics. For while the people who sent us here have different backgrounds, different stories and different beliefs, the anxieties they face are the same. The aspirations they hold are shared. A job that pays the bills. A chance to get ahead. Most of all, the ability to give their children a better life.
You know what else they share? They share a stubborn resilience in the face of adversity. After one of the most difficult years in our history, they remain busy building cars and teaching kids; starting businesses and going back to school. They're coaching little league and helping their neighbors. As one woman wrote me, "We are strained but hopeful, struggling but encouraged."
So we face big and difficult challenges. And what the American people hope what they deserve is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences; to overcome the numbing weight of our politics. For while the people who sent us here have different backgrounds, different stories and different beliefs, the anxieties they face are the same. The aspirations they hold are shared. A job that pays the bills. A chance to get ahead. Most of all, the ability to give their children a better life.
So we face big and difficult challenges. And what the American people hope -- what they deserve -- is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences; to overcome the numbing weight of our politics. For while the people who sent us here have different backgrounds, different stories and different beliefs, the anxieties they face are the same. The aspirations they hold are shared. A job that pays the bills. A chance to get ahead. Most of all, the ability to give their children a better life.
You know what else they share? They share a stubborn resilience in the face of adversity. After one of the most difficult years in our history, they remain busy building cars and teaching kids; starting businesses and going back to school. They're coaching little league and helping their neighbors. As one woman wrote me, "We are strained but hopeful, struggling but encouraged."
It is because of this spirit this great decency and great strength -- that I have never been more hopeful about America's future than I am tonight. Despite our hardships, our union is strong. We do not give up. We do not quit. We do not allow fear or division to break our spirit. In this new decade, it's time the American people get a government that matches their decency; that embodies their strength.
And tonight, I'd like to talk about how together, we can deliver on that promise.
It begins with our economy.
Our most urgent task upon taking office was to shore up the same banks that helped cause this crisis. It was not easy to do. And if there's one thing that has unified Democrats and Republicans, it's that we all hated the bank bailout. I hated it. You hated it. It was about as popular as a root canal.
But when I ran for President, I promised I wouldn't just do what was popular I would do what was necessary. And if we had allowed the meltdown of the financial system, unemployment might be double what it is today. More businesses would certainly have closed. More homes would have surely been lost.
So I supported the last administration's efforts to create the financial rescue program. And when we took the program over, we made it more transparent and accountable. As a result, the markets are now stabilized, and we have recovered most of the money we spent on the banks.
To recover the rest, I have proposed a fee on the biggest banks. I know Wall Street isn't keen on this idea, but if these firms can afford to hand out big bonuses again, they can afford a modest fee to pay back the taxpayers who rescued them in their time of need.
As we stabilized the financial system, we also took steps to get our economy growing again, save as many jobs as possible, and help Americans who had become unemployed.
That's why we extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than 18 million Americans; made health insurance 65% cheaper for families who get their coverage through COBRA; and passed 25 different tax cuts.
Let me repeat: we cut taxes. We cut taxes for 95% of working families. We cut taxes for small businesses. We cut taxes for first-time homebuyers. We cut taxes for parents trying to care for their children. We cut taxes for 8 million Americans paying for college. As a result, millions of Americans had more to spend on gas, and food, and other necessities, all of which helped businesses keep more workers. And we haven't raised income taxes by a single dime on a single person. Not a single dime.
Because of the steps we took, there are about two million Americans working right now who would otherwise be unemployed. 200,000 work in construction and clean energy. 300,000 are teachers and other education workers. Tens of thousands are cops, firefighters, correctional officers, and first responders. And we are on track to add another one and a half million jobs to this total by the end of the year.
The plan that has made all of this possible, from the tax cuts to the jobs, is the Recovery Act. That's right the Recovery Act, also known as the Stimulus Bill. Economists on the left and the right say that this bill has helped saved jobs and avert disaster. But you don't have to take their word for it.
Talk to the small business in Phoenix that will triple its workforce because of the Recovery Act.
Talk to the window manufacturer in Philadelphia who said he used to be skeptical about the Recovery Act, until he had to add two more work shifts just because of the business it created.
Talk to the single teacher raising two kids who was told by her principal in the last week of school that because of the Recovery Act, she wouldn't be laid off after all.
There are stories like this all across America. And after two years of recession, the economy is growing again. Retirement funds have started to gain back some of their value. Businesses are beginning to invest again, and slowly some are starting to hire again.
But I realize that for every success story, there are other stories, of men and women who wake up with the anguish of not knowing where their next paycheck will come from; who send out resumes week after week and hear nothing in response. That is why jobs must be our number one focus in 2010, and that is why I am calling for a new jobs bill tonight.
Now, the true engine of job creation in this country will always be America's businesses. But government can create the conditions necessary for businesses to expand and hire more workers.
We should start where most new jobs do in small businesses, companies that begin when an entrepreneur takes a chance on a dream, or a worker decides its time she became her own boss.
Through sheer grit and determination, these companies have weathered the recession and are ready to grow. But when you talk to small business owners in places like Allentown, Pennsylvania or Elyria, Ohio, you find out that even though banks on Wall Street are lending again, they are mostly lending to bigger companies. But financing remains difficult for small business owners across the country.
So tonight, I'm proposing that we take $30 billion of the money Wall Street banks have repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat. I am also proposing a new small business tax credit one that will go to over one million small businesses who hire new workers or raise wages. While we're at it, let's also eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment; and provide a tax incentive for all businesses, large and small, to invest in new plants and equipment.
Next, we can put Americans to work today building the infrastructure of tomorrow. From the first railroads to the interstate highway system, our nation has always been built to compete. There's no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products.
Tomorrow, I'll visit Tampa, Florida, where workers will soon break ground on a new high-speed railroad funded by the Recovery Act. There are projects like that all across this country that will create jobs and help our nation move goods, services, and information. We should put more Americans to work building clean energy facilities, and give rebates to Americans who make their homes more energy efficient, which supports clean energy jobs. And to encourage these and other businesses to stay within our borders, it's time to finally slash the tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs in the United States of America.
The House has passed a jobs bill that includes some of these steps. As the first order of business this year, I urge the Senate to do the same. People are out of work. They are hurting. They need our help. And I want a jobs bill on my desk without delay.
But the truth is, these steps still won't make up for the seven million jobs we've lost over the last two years. The only way to move to full employment is to lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth, and finally address the problems that America's families have confronted for years.
We cannot afford another so-called economic "expansion" like the one from last decade what some call the "lost decade" where jobs grew more slowly than during any prior expansion; where the income of the average American household declined while the cost of health care and tuition reached record highs; where prosperity was built on a housing bubble and financial speculation.
From the day I took office, I have been told that addressing our larger challenges is too ambitious that such efforts would be too contentious, that our political system is too gridlocked, and that we should just put things on hold for awhile.
For those who make these claims, I have one simple question:
How long should we wait? How long should America put its future on hold?
You see, Washington has been telling us to wait for decades, even as the problems have grown worse. Meanwhile, China's not waiting to revamp its economy. Germany's not waiting. India's not waiting. These nations aren't standing still. These nations aren't playing for second place. They're putting more emphasis on math and science. They're rebuilding their infrastructure. They are making serious investments in clean energy because they want those jobs.
Well I do not accept second-place for the United States of America. As hard as it may be, as uncomfortable and contentious as the debates may be, it's time to get serious about fixing the problems that are hampering our growth.
One place to start is serious financial reform. Look, I am not interested in punishing banks, I'm interested in protecting our economy. A strong, healthy financial market makes it possible for businesses to access credit and create new jobs. It channels the savings of families into investments that raise incomes. But that can only happen if we guard against the same recklessness that nearly brought down our entire economy.
We need to make sure consumers and middle-class families have the information they need to make financial decisions. We can't allow financial institutions, including those that take your deposits, to take risks that threaten the whole economy.
The House has already passed financial reform with many of these changes. And the lobbyists are already trying to kill it. Well, we cannot let them win this fight. And if the bill that ends up on my desk does not meet the test of real reform, I will send it back.
Next, we need to encourage American innovation. Last year, we made the largest investment in basic research funding in history an investment that could lead to the world's cheapest solar cells or treatment that kills cancer cells but leaves healthy ones untouched. And no area is more ripe for such innovation than energy. You can see the results of last year's investment in clean energy in the North Carolina company that will create 1200 jobs nationwide helping to make advanced batteries; or in the California business that will put 1,000 people to work making solar panels.
But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. That means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development. It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies. And yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America.
I am grateful to the House for passing such a bill last year. This year, I am eager to help advance the bipartisan effort in the Senate. I know there have been questions about whether we can afford such changes in a tough economy; and I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change. But even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy. And America must be that nation.
Third, we need to export more of our goods. Because the more products we make and sell to other countries, the more jobs we support right here in America. So tonight, we set a new goal: We will double our exports over the next five years, an increase that will support two million jobs in America. To help meet this goal, we're launching a National Export Initiative that will help farmers and small businesses increase their exports, and reform export controls consistent with national security.
We have to seek new markets aggressively, just as our competitors are. If America sits on the sidelines while other nations sign trade deals, we will lose the chance to create jobs on our shores. But realizing those benefits also means enforcing those agreements so our trading partners play by the rules. And that's why we will continue to shape a Doha trade agreement that opens global markets, and why we will strengthen our trade relations in Asia and with key partners like South Korea, Panama, and Colombia.
Fourth, we need to invest in the skills and education of our people.
This year, we have broken through the stalemate between left and right by launching a national competition to improve our schools. The idea here is simple: instead of rewarding failure, we only reward success. Instead of funding the status quo, we only invest in reform reform that raises student achievement, inspires students to excel in math and science, and turns around failing schools that steal the future of too many young Americans, from rural communities to inner-cities. In the 21st century, one of the best anti-poverty programs is a world-class education. In this country, the success of our children cannot depend more on where they live than their potential.
When we renew the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, we will work with Congress to expand these reforms to all fifty states. Still, in this economy, a high school diploma no longer guarantees a good job. I urge the Senate to follow the House and pass a bill that will revitalize our community colleges, which are a career pathway to the children of so many working families. To make college more affordable, this bill will finally end the unwarranted taxpayer-subsidies that go to banks for student loans. Instead, let's take that money and give families a $10,000 tax credit for four years of college and increase Pell Grants. And let's tell another one million students that when they graduate, they will be required to pay only ten percent of their income on student loans, and all of their debt will be forgiven after twenty years and forgiven after ten years if they choose a career in public service. Because in the United States of America, no one should go broke because they chose to go to college. And it's time for colleges and universities to get serious about cutting their own costs because they too have a responsibility to help solve this problem.
Now, the price of college tuition is just one of the burdens facing the middle-class. That's why last year I asked Vice President Biden to chair a task force on Middle-Class Families. That's why we're nearly doubling the child care tax credit, and making it easier to save for retirement by giving every worker access to a retirement account and expanding the tax credit for those who start a nest egg. That's why we're working to lift the value of a family's single largest investment their home. The steps we took last year to shore up the housing market have allowed millions of Americans to take out new loans and save an average of $1,500 on mortgage payments. This year, we will step up re-financing so that homeowners can move into more affordable mortgages. And it is precisely to relieve the burden on middle-class families that we still need health insurance reform.
Now let's be clear -- I did not choose to tackle this issue to get some legislative victory under my belt. And by now it should be fairly obvious that I didn't take on health care because it was good politics.
I took on health care because of the stories I've heard from Americans with pre-existing conditions whose lives depend on getting coverage; patients who've been denied coverage; and families even those with insurance who are just one illness away from financial ruin.
After nearly a century of trying, we are closer than ever to bringing more security to the lives of so many Americans. The approach we've taken would protect every American from the worst practices of the insurance industry. It would give small businesses and uninsured Americans a chance to choose an affordable health care plan in a competitive market. It would require every insurance plan to cover preventive care. And by the way, I want to acknowledge our First Lady, Michelle Obama, who this year is creating a national movement to tackle the epidemic of childhood obesity and make our kids healthier.
Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan. It would reduce costs and premiums for millions of families and businesses. And according to the Congressional Budget Office -- the independent organization that both parties have cited as the official scorekeeper for Congress -- our approach would bring down the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades.

Still, this is a complex issue, and the longer it was debated, the more skeptical people became. I take my share of the blame for not explaining it more clearly to the American people. And I know that with all the lobbying and horse-trading, this process left most Americans wondering what's in it for them.
But I also know this problem is not going away. By the time I'm finished speaking tonight, more Americans will have lost their health insurance. Millions will lose it this year. Our deficit will grow. Premiums will go up. Patients will be denied the care they need. Small business owners will continue to drop coverage altogether. I will not walk away from these Americans, and neither should the people in this chamber.

As temperatures cool, I want everyone to take another look at the plan we've proposed. There's a reason why many doctors, nurses, and health care experts who know our system best consider this approach a vast improvement over the status quo. But if anyone from either party has a better approach that will bring down premiums, bring down the deficit, cover the uninsured, strengthen Medicare for seniors, and stop insurance company abuses, let me know. Here's what I ask of Congress, though: Do not walk away from reform. Not now. Not when we are so close. Let us find a way to come together and finish the job for the American people.
Now, even as health care reform would reduce our deficit, it's not enough to dig us out of a massive fiscal hole in which we find ourselves. It's a challenge that makes all others that much harder to solve, and one that's been subject to a lot of political posturing.
So let me start the discussion of government spending by setting the record straight. At the beginning of the last decade, America had a budget surplus of over $200 billion. By the time I took office, we had a one year deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade. Most of this was the result of not paying for two wars, two tax cuts, and an expensive prescription drug program. On top of that, the effects of the recession put a $3 trillion hole in our budget. That was before I walked in the door.
Now if we had taken office in ordinary times, I would have liked nothing more than to start bringing down the deficit. But we took office amid a crisis, and our efforts to prevent a second Depression have added another $1 trillion to our national debt.
I am absolutely convinced that was the right thing to do. But families across the country are tightening their belts and making tough decisions. The federal government should do the same. So tonight, I'm proposing specific steps to pay for the $1 trillion that it took to rescue the economy last year.
Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected. But all other discretionary government programs will. Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don't. And if I have to enforce this discipline by veto, I will.
We will continue to go through the budget line by line to eliminate programs that we can't afford and don't work. We've already identified $20 billion in savings for next year. To help working families, we will extend our middle-class tax cuts. But at a time of record deficits, we will not continue tax cuts for oil companies, investment fund managers, and those making over $250,000 a year. We just can't afford it.
Now, even after paying for what we spent on my watch, we will still face the massive deficit we had when I took office. More importantly, the cost of Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will continue to skyrocket. That's why I've called for a bipartisan, Fiscal Commission, modeled on a proposal by Republican Judd Gregg and Democrat Kent Conrad. This can't be one of those Washington gimmicks that lets us pretend we solved a problem. The Commission will have to provide a specific set of solutions by a certain deadline. Yesterday, the Senate blocked a bill that would have created this commission. So I will issue an executive order that will allow us to go forward, because I refuse to pass this problem on to another generation of Americans. And when the vote comes tomorrow, the Senate should restore the pay-as-you-go law that was a big reason why we had record surpluses in the 1990s.
I know that some in my own party will argue that we cannot address the deficit or freeze government spending when so many are still hurting. I agree, which is why this freeze will not take effect until next year, when the economy is stronger. But understand if we do not take meaningful steps to rein in our debt, it could damage our markets, increase the cost of borrowing, and jeopardize our recovery all of which could have an even worse effect on our job growth and family incomes.
From some on the right, I expect we'll hear a different argument -- that if we just make fewer investments in our people, extend tax cuts for wealthier Americans, eliminate more regulations, and maintain the status quo on health care, our deficits will go away. The problem is, that's what we did for eight years. That's what helped lead us into this crisis. It's what helped lead to these deficits. And we cannot do it again.

Rather than fight the same tired battles that have dominated Washington for decades, it's time to try something new. Let's invest in our people without leaving them a mountain of debt. Let's meet our responsibility to the citizens who sent us here. Let's try common sense.
To do that, we have to recognize that we face more than a deficit of dollars right now. We face a deficit of trust deep and corrosive doubts about how Washington works that have been growing for years. To close that credibility gap we must take action on both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue to end the outsized influence of lobbyists; to do our work openly; and to give our people the government they deserve.
That's what I came to Washington to do. That's why for the first time in history my Administration posts our White House visitors online. And that's why we've excluded lobbyists from policy-making jobs or seats on federal boards and commissions.
But we can't stop there. It's time to require lobbyists to disclose each contact they make on behalf of a client with my Administration or Congress. And it's time to put strict limits on the contributions that lobbyists give to candidates for federal office. Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests including foreign corporations to spend without limit in our elections. Well I don't think American elections should be bankrolled by America's most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that's why I'm urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong.
I'm also calling on Congress to continue down the path of earmark reform. You have trimmed some of this spending and embraced some meaningful change. But restoring the public trust demands more. For example, some members of Congress post some earmark requests online. Tonight, I'm calling on Congress to publish all earmark requests on a single website before there's a vote so that the American people can see how their money is being spent.
Of course, none of these reforms will even happen if we don't also reform how we work with one another.
Now, I am not naïve. I never thought the mere fact of my election would usher in peace, harmony, and some post-partisan era. I knew that both parties have fed divisions that are deeply entrenched. And on some issues, there are simply philosophical differences that will always cause us to part ways. These disagreements, about the role of government in our lives, about our national priorities and our national security, have been taking place for over two hundred years. They are the very essence of our democracy.
But what frustrates the American people is a Washington where every day is Election Day. We cannot wage a perpetual campaign where the only goal is to see who can get the most embarrassing headlines about their opponent a belief that if you lose, I win. Neither party should delay or obstruct every single bill just because they can. The confirmation of well-qualified public servants should not be held hostage to the pet projects or grudges of a few individual Senators. Washington may think that saying anything about the other side, no matter how false, is just part of the game. But it is precisely such politics that has stopped either party from helping the American people. Worse yet, it is sowing further division among our citizens and further distrust in our government.
So no, I will not give up on changing the tone of our politics. I know it's an election year. And after last week, it is clear that campaign fever has come even earlier than usual. But we still need to govern. To Democrats, I would remind you that we still have the largest majority in decades, and the people expect us to solve some problems, not run for the hills. And if the Republican leadership is going to insist that sixty votes in the Senate are required to do any business at all in this town, then the responsibility to govern is now yours as well. Just saying no to everything may be good short-term politics, but it's not leadership. We were sent here to serve our citizens, not our ambitions. So let's show the American people that we can do it together. This week, I'll be addressing a meeting of the House Republicans. And I would like to begin monthly meetings with both the Democratic and Republican leadership. I know you can't wait.
Throughout our history, no issue has united this country more than our security. Sadly, some of the unity we felt after 9/11 has dissipated. We can argue all we want about who's to blame for this, but I am not interested in re-litigating the past. I know that all of us love this country. All of us are committed to its defense. So let's put aside the schoolyard taunts about who is tough. Let's reject the false choice between protecting our people and upholding our values. Let's leave behind the fear and division, and do what it takes to defend our nation and forge a more hopeful future for America and the world.
That is the work we began last year. Since the day I took office, we have renewed our focus on the terrorists who threaten our nation. We have made substantial investments in our homeland security and disrupted plots that threatened to take American lives. We are filling unacceptable gaps revealed by the failed Christmas attack, with better airline security, and swifter action on our intelligence. We have prohibited torture and strengthened partnerships from the Pacific to South Asia to the Arabian Peninsula. And in the last year, hundreds of Al Qaeda's fighters and affiliates, including many senior leaders, have been captured or killed far more than in 2008.
In Afghanistan, we are increasing our troops and training Afghan Security Forces so they can begin to take the lead in July of 2011, and our troops can begin to come home. We will reward good governance, reduce corruption, and support the rights of all Afghans men and women alike. We are joined by allies and partners who have increased their own commitment, and who will come together tomorrow in London to reaffirm our common purpose. There will be difficult days ahead. But I am confident we will succeed.
As we take the fight to al Qaeda, we are responsibly leaving Iraq to its people. As a candidate, I promised that I would end this war, and that is what I am doing as President. We will have all of our combat troops out of Iraq by the end of this August. We will support the Iraqi government as they hold elections, and continue to partner with the Iraqi people to promote regional peace and prosperity. But make no mistake: this war is ending, and all of our troops are coming home.
Tonight, all of our men and women in uniform -- in Iraq, Afghanistan, and around the world must know that they have our respect, our gratitude, and our full support. And just as they must have the resources they need in war, we all have a responsibility to support them when they come home. That is why we made the largest increase in investments for veterans in decades. That is why we are building a 21st century VA. And that is why Michelle has joined with Jill Biden to forge a national commitment to support military families.
Even as we prosecute two wars, we are also confronting perhaps the greatest danger to the American people the threat of nuclear weapons. I have embraced the vision of John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan through a strategy that reverses the spread of these weapons, and seeks a world without them. To reduce our stockpiles and launchers, while ensuring our deterrent, the United States and Russia are completing negotiations on the farthest-reaching arms control treaty in nearly two decades. And at April's Nuclear Security Summit, we will bring forty-four nations together behind a clear goal: securing all vulnerable nuclear materials around the world in four years, so that they never fall into the hands of terrorists.
These diplomatic efforts have also strengthened our hand in dealing with those nations that insist on violating international agreements in pursuit of these weapons. That is why North Korea now faces increased isolation, and stronger sanctions sanctions that are being vigorously enforced. That is why the international community is more united, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is more isolated. And as Iran's leaders continue to ignore their obligations, there should be no doubt: they, too, will face growing consequences.
That is the leadership that we are providing -- engagement that advances the common security and prosperity of all people. We are working through the G-20 to sustain a lasting global recovery. We are working with Muslim communities around the world to promote science, education and innovation. We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change. We are helping developing countries to feed themselves, and continuing the fight against HIV/AIDS. And we are launching a new initiative that will give us the capacity to respond faster and more effectively to bio-terrorism or an infectious disease a plan that will counter threats at home, and strengthen public health abroad.
As we have for over sixty years, America takes these actions because our destiny is connected to those beyond our shores. But we also do it because it is right. That is why, as we meet here tonight, over 10,000 Americans are working with many nations to help the people of Haiti recover and rebuild. That is why we stand with the girl who yearns to go to school in Afghanistan; we support the human rights of the women marching through the streets of Iran; and we advocate for the young man denied a job by corruption in Guinea. For America must always stand on the side of freedom and human dignity.
Abroad, America's greatest source of strength has always been our ideals. The same is true at home. We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal, that no matter who you are or what you look like, if you abide by the law you should be protected by it; that if you adhere to our common values you should be treated no different than anyone else.
We must continually renew this promise. My Administration has a Civil Rights Division that is once again prosecuting civil rights violations and employment discrimination. We finally strengthened our laws to protect against crimes driven by hate. This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are. We are going to crack down on violations of equal pay laws so that women get equal pay for an equal day's work. And we should continue the work of fixing our broken immigration system to secure our borders, enforce our laws, and ensure that everyone who plays by the rules can contribute to our economy and enrich our nations.
In the end, it is our ideals, our values, that built America -- values that allowed us to forge a nation made up of immigrants from every corner of the globe; values that drive our citizens still. Every day, Americans meet their responsibilities to their families and their employers. Time and again, they lend a hand to their neighbors and give back to their country. They take pride in their labor, and are generous in spirit. These aren't Republican values or Democratic values they're living by; business values or labor values. They are American values.
Unfortunately, too many of our citizens have lost faith that our biggest institutions -- our corporations, our media, and yes, our government -- still reflect these same values. Each of these institutions are full of honorable men and women doing important work that helps our country prosper. But each time a CEO rewards himself for failure, or a banker puts the rest of us at risk for his own selfish gain, people's doubts grow. Each time lobbyists game the system or politicians tear each other down instead of lifting this country up, we lose faith. The more that TV pundits reduce serious debates into silly arguments, and big issues into sound bites, our citizens turn away.
No wonder there's so much cynicism out there.
No wonder there's so much disappointment.
I campaigned on the promise of change change we can believe in, the slogan went. And right now, I know there are many Americans who aren't sure if they still believe we can change or at least, that I can deliver it.
But remember this I never suggested that change would be easy, or that I can do it alone. Democracy in a nation of three hundred million people can be noisy and messy and complicated. And when you try to do big things and make big changes, it stirs passions and controversy. That's just how it is.
Those of us in public office can respond to this reality by playing it safe and avoid telling hard truths. We can do what's necessary to keep our poll numbers high, and get through the next election instead of doing what's best for the next generation.
But I also know this: if people had made that decision fifty years ago or one hundred years ago or two hundred years ago, we wouldn't be here tonight. The only reason we are is because generations of Americans were unafraid to do what was hard; to do what was needed even when success was uncertain; to do what it took to keep the dream of this nation alive for their children and grandchildren.
Our administration has had some political setbacks this year, and some of them were deserved. But I wake up every day knowing that they are nothing compared to the setbacks that families all across this country have faced this year. And what keeps me going what keeps me fighting is that despite all these setbacks, that spirit of determination and optimism that fundamental decency that has always been at the core of the American people lives on.
It lives on in the struggling small business owner who wrote to me of his company, "None of us," he said, "are willing to consider, even slightly, that we might fail."
It lives on in the woman who said that even though she and her neighbors have felt the pain of recession, "We are strong. We are resilient. We are American."
It lives on in the 8-year old boy in Louisiana, who just sent me his allowance and asked if I would give it to the people of Haiti. And it lives on in all the Americans who've dropped everything to go some place they've never been and pull people they've never known from rubble, prompting chants of "U.S.A.! U.S.A.! U.S.A!" when another life was saved.
The spirit that has sustained this nation for more than two centuries lives on in you, its people.
We have finished a difficult year. We have come through a difficult decade. But a new year has come. A new decade stretches before us. We don't quit. I don't quit. Let's seize this moment to start anew, to carry the dream forward, and to strengthen our union once more.
Thank you. God Bless You. And God Bless the United States of America.


[관련키워드]

[뉴스핌 베스트 기사]

사진
'북한'인가 '조선'인가 호칭 논쟁 [서울=뉴스핌] 김현구 기자 = 최슬아 숭실대 교수는 29일 "북한이라는 호명이 상대방을 한반도의 일부처럼 위치시킨다면 조선이라는 호명은 하나의 독립된 행위자로 인정하는 방향으로 작동할 수 있다"고 진단했다. 최 교수는 "북한을 인정해야 된다는 주장은 어떤 온정적인 제안이 아니라 상대를 인정함으로써 불안을 낮추고 관계를 보다 안정적으로 관리하기 위한 굉장히 중요한 출발점이 될 것"이라고 내다봤다. 한국정치학회(회장 윤종빈)는 이날 서울 중구 한국프레스센터에서 '평화 공존을 위한 이름 부르기:북한인가 조선인가' 주제로 특별학술회의를 열었다. 통일부는 관련 논의를 공론화한다는 취지에서 이번 학술회의를 후원했다. 사회를 맡은 권만학 경희대 명예교수는 "호칭은 기본적으로 식별 기능을 갖지만 정치적 호칭이 되는 순간 이데올로기를 담게 된다"고 말했다. 권 교수는 "북한은 '대한민국'을 공식 명칭으로 부르며 남쪽을 외국으로 재정의했다"면서 "하지만 우리는 여전히 '북한' '북측'이라는 표현을 사용한다"며 토론 필요성을 강조했다. 정동영 통일부 장관이 지난 20일 서울 종로구 정부서울청사에 들어서며 도어스태핑을 갖고 최근 북한 '핵시설' 발언에 대한 입장을 밝히고 있다. [사진=뉴스핌DB] ◆ 김성경 "호칭은 분단 산물…'조선' 관계 전환 출발점" 김성경 서강대 교수는 "북한이라는 호명은 비공식적·약칭적 표현이지만 분단 80년 동안 누적된 정치적 의미를 가진 것"이라면서 "북한을 계속 북한이라고 부르는 한 우리 안에 북한이 계속 갇힐 수밖에 없다"고 진단했다. 김 교수는 "학계에서는 (북한을) 조선, 북조선으로 부르는 경향이 좀 있었다"며 "남과 북의 국가 정체성이 이미 상당히 공고화돼 있는 현 상황에서 국가와 국가 사이의 관계 맺기를 본격적으로 시작할 수 있는 시기가 도래한 것"이라고 평가했다. 김 교수는 "북한을 계속 유지한다는 것이 평화공존이나 통일에 더 도움이 된다는 논리적 근거를 찾기 어렵다"면서 "우리가 상상할 수 있는 통일은 남북이 서로를 인정 존중하고 그 맥락 안에서 관계를 맺고 남북 주민이 통일을 선택하는 것이 가장 현실적인 방안"이라고 제시했다. ◆ 권은민 "국호 사용, 국가 승인 아냐…정치가 먼저, 법은 따라간다" 권은민 김앤장법률사무소 변호사는 "북한을 조선민주주의인민공화국 또는 'DPRK'라고 부른다고 해서 그것이 꼭 국가 승인이나 정부 승인을 구성하지는 않는다"면서 "국가 승인은 정치적 행위이고 국가 의사 표시다. 그렇게 부르더라도 국가 승인과는 무관하다라고 선언을 하면 정리가 되는 문제"라고 진단했다. 권 변호사는 "남북관계는 법률의 영역이라기보다는 정치의 영역에 가까운 것 같다"면서 "과거에도 정치가 큰 틀을 규정하고 법과 제도가 따라가는 변화가 있었다"고 설명했다. 권 변호사는 "남북 기본합의서 제1조는 '상대방의 체제를 인정하고 존중한다'고 돼 있다"면서 "이름을 제대로 불러주는 것이 그 출발점"이라고 강조했다. 권 변호사는 "국호 사용은 상호 주권을 존중하는 취지의 기존 합의를 계승하는 것"이라면서 "당사자 표기는 상대방이 원하는 공식 국호를 불러주고 그것이 국가 승인은 아니다라는 것을 전제로 하면 된다"고 제언했다. [서울=뉴스핌] 이영종 통일북한전문기자 = 북한 국무위원장 김정은이 군수공업을 담당하는 제2경제위 산하 중요 군수공장을 방문했다고 관영 조선중앙통신이 12일 보도했다. 사진은 김정은이 이 공장에서 생산된 권총으로 사격하는 모습. [사진=북한매체 종합] 2026.03.12 yjlee@newspim.com ◆ 이동기 "독일도 경멸적 호칭 쓰다 공식 국호 전환…출발은 이름" 이동기 강원대 교수는 "서독은 동독을 경멸적 표현으로 불렀지만 긴장이 격화되면서 더 큰 평화 정치에 대한 구상이 폭발했다"면서 "국제 환경이 좋지 않을수록 평화 화해 논의가 공존에 대한 요구나 필요를 폭발할 수도 있다"고 진단했다.  이 교수는 "독일 정치권에서는 헤르베르트 베너 전독문제부(통일부) 장관이 가장 먼저 동독 공식 국호를 사용했다"며 "당시에는 언론의 융단 폭격을 받았지만 시간이 해결해줬다. 국제법적으로는 여전히 인정하지 않았지만 실질적으로는 국가로 승인한 것"이라고 설명했다. 이 교수는 "원칙을 고수하는 것만으로는 부족하고 인내만으로도 부족하다"면서 "결국 원칙 고수와 실용주의가 결합하는 모든 출발은 국호의 제대로 된 호명이고, 동시에 장기적으로는 근본 전환이 필요하다"고 제언했다. ◆ "호칭 변경, 굴복 아닌 공존 가능성 넓히는 정치적 전략" 패널 토론에서 전문가들은 조선 호명에 대해 긍정적인 입장을 제시했다. 김태경 성공회대 교수는 "젊은 세대에는 '둘의 우리'가 상식적으로 받아들여지는 시점"이라며 "우리가 조선을 일종의 주권 국가로서 인정하는 과정은 결국 우리에 대한 자기 인정과 그들에 대한 인정이 같이 결합되는 부분"이라고 설명했다. 김주희 국립부경대 교수는 "핵심은 인정과 통일 사이의 균형을 어떻게 접근할 것인가에 대한 부분"이라면서 "실질적으로 가는 데 있어서는 담론과 제도, 정치 차원에서의 접근을 만들어가야 한다"고 제언했다. 김 교수는 "호칭을 바꾸는 것은 굴복이 아니라 적대를 줄이고 공존의 가능성을 넓히는 하나의 정치적 전략일 수 있다"고 분석했다.  hyun9@newspim.com 2026-04-29 18:04
사진
제이알發 쇼크에 리츠업계 초긴장 [서울=뉴스핌] 정영희 기자 = 국내 1호 해외 부동산 공모 리츠인 제이알글로벌리츠가 자산 가치 하락과 유동성 위기를 견디지 못하고 결국 법정관리를 신청했다. 상장 리츠 가운데 사실상 첫 디폴트 사례가 발생하면서 시장에 적잖은 충격을 주고 있다. 다만 업계에서는 이번 사안을 개별 리츠의 리스크로 보는 시각이 우세하며, 전체 시장으로 확산되는 시스템 리스크 가능성은 제한적일 것이라는 분석이 많다. 정부는 관련 시장에 대한 긴급 점검에 착수하는 한편, 필요 시 유동성 지원과 함께 구조 개선을 병행하는 등 시장 안정화 대책을 추진할 방침이다. [AI 그래픽 생성=정영희 기자] ◆ 무너진 해외 부동산 가치…유동성 위기 예견됐나 30일 리츠업계에 따르면 제이알투자운용의 기업회생 절차 돌입으로 인해 투자자들의 긴장감이 시장 전반으로 확산하는 모양새다. 국내 대형 독립계 리츠 자산관리회사인 제이알투자운용이 2020년 국내 최초로 유가증권시장에 안착시킨 해외 부동산 공모 리츠다. 벨기에 브뤼셀 중심부에 위치한 파이낸스타워와 미국 뉴욕 맨해튼의 498세븐스애비뉴 등 대형 상업용 오피스 빌딩을 기초 자산으로 편입해 운용해 왔다. 그러나 금리 상승 등의 영향으로 벨기에 브뤼셀 파이낸스타워 가치가 떨어지면서, 단기사채 400억원을 상환하지 못해 지난 27일 서울회생법원에 회생 절차 개시를 신청했다. 한국거래소는 전일 매매 거래를 정지하고 관리종목으로 지정했다. 이번 사태는 어느 정도 예견된 수순이었다는 분석이 힘을 얻고 있다. 제이알글로벌리츠는 지난 1월 1200억원 규모의 유상증자를 공시했으나 해외 자산의 감정평가서 수신 지연 등을 이유로 한 달 만인 2월 이를 자진 철회했다. 핵심 자산인 벨기에 파이낸스타워의 감정평가액이 급락하면서 현지 대주단과 약정한 담보인정비율을 초과했다. 임대료 등으로 발생한 현금 흐름을 대출 상환에 우선 충당하도록 묶어두는 캐시트랩(Cash Trap, 현금 동결)이 발동되더니 기업회생으로 이어졌다.  박광식 한국기업평가 수석연구원은 "올 들어 차입 만기 도래에 따른 차환 부담이 지속되는 가운데 환헤지(환율 고정 상품) 정산금 명목으로 약 1000억원의 추가적인 자금 조달이 시급하다"며 "캐시트랩 해소를 위해서는 약 7830만유로(한화 약 1354억원)의 현지 차입금 상환을 위한 추가 재원 조달이 필요하다"고 말했다. ◆ 일제히 꺾인 리츠주…시스템 리스크 확산은 기우? 이 같은 악재에 상장 리츠 전체에 대한 투자 심리가 급격히 악화될 수 있다는 우려가 고개를 든다. 실제로 한국거래소 거래 동향을 살펴보면 이날 리츠 종목들은 일제히 곤두박질쳤다. 마스턴프리미어리츠가 큰 폭으로 미끄러진 것을 비롯해 한화리츠, 삼성FN리츠, SK리츠, 코람코라이프인프라리츠 등이 급락세를 면치 못하며 시장의 불안감을 드러냈다. 뚜렷한 성장 가도를 달리던 리츠 업계는 발을 동동 구르는 처지가 됐다. 한국리츠협회 통계에 따르면 지난달 31일 종가 기준으로 국내 증시에 상장된 25개 리츠의 시가총액은 9조7778억원을 기록했다. 리츠 시장은 지난해 1월 8조103억원 수준에서 같은 해 9월 9조2048억원을 돌파했고 5개월 만인 지난 2월에는 10조원을 넘어서는 등 몸집을 불려왔다. 그동안 일반 주식에 밀려 상대적으로 소외됐지만, 최근 코스피 강세장 속에서 안정적인 피난처로 주목받은 결과다. 법적으로 배당 가능 이익의 90% 이상을 의무적으로 배당해야 하는 구조적 특성 덕분에 확실한 현금 흐름을 선호하는 투자 자금이 대거 몰린 것도 호재 원인 중 하나로 제시됐다. 그러나 이번 사태의 파장이 전체 금융 시장으로 퍼질 것이란 예측은 설득력이 떨어진다는 지적이다. 국내 상장 리츠 22개사 중 해외 자산을 보유한 비중은 14.3%이지만, 전체 자산 기준으로 환산하면 해외 자산 비중은 1.2%에 불과하다. 국내 상장 리츠의 총투자 자산 대비 해외 자산이 차지하는 파이가 극히 작아 전이 가능성이 낮다는 뜻이다. 지난달 말 자산 구성 및 투자 유형별 포트폴리오 비중을 보면 주택이 44.0%로 가장 컸다. 오피스는 35.3%에 머물렀으며 리테일 6.4%, 물류 6.4%, 혼합형 3.6%, 기타 3.2%, 호텔 1.1% 순으로 나타나 이번 위기의 진원지인 해외 오피스 리스크와는 거리를 두고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 조수희 LS증권 연구원은 제이알리츠의 최근 기준 발행 잔액이 약 4000억원으로 전체 크레딧 시장 규모와 비교하면 찻잔 속의 태풍 수준이라고 일축했다. 일반 크레딧물과 달리 리츠가 발행한 회사채는 개인 투자자의 비중이 압도적으로 높아 기관 투자자 중심으로 굴러가는 국내 크레딧 시장 심리에 타격을 주기는 구조적으로 어렵다는 판단이다. 김은기 삼성증권 연구원 역시 이번 이벤트가 단기사채 미상환으로 불거진 만큼 단기 자금 시장 경색이 회사채 시장으로 파급될까 우려하는 시각이 존재하지만 최근 풍부한 단기 자금을 바탕으로 기업어음 금리가 안정적으로 낮게 유지되고 있어 과거의 신용 위기와는 양상이 완전히 다르다고 선을 그었다. ◆ 국토부 방화벽 구축 총력전…상장리츠, 자산 다각화 과제로 다만 해외 부동산 자산에 직간접적으로 투자하는 리츠 종목들은 당분간 위축된 행보를 보일 가능성을 배제할 수 없다. 현재 해외 부동산 자산에 투자하는 상장 리츠는 KB스타리츠, 미래에셋글로벌리츠, 마스턴프리미어리츠, 신한글로벌액티브리츠, 디앤디플랫폼리츠, 이지스레지던스리츠 등이다. 이 중 해외 자산 구성 비중이 100%인 곳이 3개사, 50% 이상이 2개사, 50% 미만이 3개사로 파악됐다. 대표적으로 디앤디플랫폼리츠는 일본 소재 아마존 물류센터에 간접 투자 중이며 이지스레지던스리츠는 미국 소재 임대주택 및 대학 기숙사에 자금을 투입하고 있다. 이은미 나이스신용평가 수석연구원은 "해외 자산의 장부 가치 비중이 각 리츠 총자산의 5~30% 수준에 그쳐 전반적인 쏠림 현상은 없다"면서도 "해외 자산을 보유한 개별 리츠의 경우 현지 대출 약정 위반에 따른 현금 흐름 통제와 국내 채무 차환 부담이라는 이중고를 동시에 겪을 수 있어 리스크 관리가 필요하다"고 말했다. 글로벌 부동산 시장의 한파도 부담이다. 모건스탠리캐피털인터내셔널 보고서에 따르면 지난해 4분기 주요 도시 상업용 부동산 가격은 전년 동기 대비 4.7% 떨어졌다. 고점을 찍었던 2022년과 15%나 증발했다. 런던과 베를린 등 유럽 주요 도시의 상업용 부동산 가격은 30% 넘게 폭락했다. 정부도 사태의 엄중함을 인지하고 발 빠르게 방화벽 구축에 나섰다. 국토교통부는 이날 오후 김이탁 제1차관 주재로 금융위원회, 한국부동산원, 금융감독원 등 관계 부처를 긴급 소집해 점검 회의를 열었다. 리츠 시장 전반의 현황을 점검하는 한편, 투자자 보호를 위한 대응 방향을 집중적으로 논의하기 위한 자리다. 국토부 관계자는 "제이알글로벌리츠의 부실화 과정에서 불거진 각종 의혹을 규명하기 위해 전일 합동 검사에 착수했으며, 불법 행위가 적발될 경우 엄정 대응할 방침"이라며 "시장 안정을 위해서 대기업이나 공기업이 최대주주가 되는 앵커리츠를 공급하고, 변동성이 통제 수준을 넘어설 경우 채권 및 자금 시장 안정 프로그램 규모를 즉각적으로 늘릴 수 있도록 비상 대응 체계를 가동하겠다"고 말했다. 시장 전문가들은 사태 수습을 넘어 리츠 시장의 근본적인 체질 개선과 신뢰 회복이 시급하다고 목소리를 높이고 있다. 상장 리츠의 주가를 궤도에 올려놓고 시장을 활성화하기 위해서는 투자자의 신뢰를 되찾는 것이 급선무라고 지적했다. 김필규 자본시장연구원 선임연구위원은 "정보의 투명성이 담보된 상태에서 시장 상황에 맞게 자금 조달의 유연성을 높여주고, 우량 자산 편입과 리츠 간 합병을 통해 자산 포트폴리오를 다각화하는 정책이 뒤따라야 한다"며 "자산관리회사 역시 수동적인 태도에서 벗어나 운용 현황과 배당 전략 등을 공개하고, 적극적으로 소통함으로써 정보 비대칭으로 인한 불신을 거둬내야 한다"고 제언했다. chulsoofriend@newspim.com 2026-04-30 06:00
기사 번역
결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.
종목 추적기

S&P 500 기업 중 기사 내용이 영향을 줄 종목 추적

결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.

긍정 영향 종목

  • Lockheed Martin Corp. Industrials
    우크라이나 안보 지원 강화 기대감으로 방산 수요 증가 직접적. 미·러 긴장 완화 불확실성 속에서도 방위산업 매출 안정성 강화 예상됨.

부정 영향 종목

  • Caterpillar Inc. Industrials
    우크라이나 전쟁 장기화 시 건설 및 중장비 수요 불확실성 직접적. 글로벌 인프라 투자 지연으로 매출 성장 둔화 가능성 있음.
이 내용에 포함된 데이터와 의견은 뉴스핌 AI가 분석한 결과입니다. 정보 제공 목적으로만 작성되었으며, 특정 종목 매매를 권유하지 않습니다. 투자 판단 및 결과에 대한 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다. 주식 투자는 원금 손실 가능성이 있으므로, 투자 전 충분한 조사와 전문가 상담을 권장합니다.
안다쇼핑
Top으로 이동