전체기사 최신뉴스 GAM
KYD 디데이
글로벌

속보

더보기

오바마 2013 국정연설 원문 - 1

기사입력 :

최종수정 :

※ 본문 글자 크기 조정

  • 더 작게
  • 작게
  • 보통
  • 크게
  • 더 크게

※ 번역할 언어 선택

President Obama's State of the Union Address:

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice President, Members of Congress, fellow citizens:

Fifty-one years ago, John F. Kennedy declared to this Chamber that "the Constitution makes us not rivals for power but partners for progress…It is my task," he said, "to report the State of the Union – to improve it is the task of us all."

Tonight, thanks to the grit and determination of the American people, there is much progress to report. After a decade of grinding war, our brave men and women in uniform are coming home. After years of grueling recession, our businesses have created over six million new jobs. We buy more American cars than we have in five years, and less foreign oil than we have in twenty. Our housing market is healing, our stock market is rebounding, and consumers, patients, and homeowners enjoy stronger protections than ever before.

Together, we have cleared away the rubble of crisis, and can say with renewed confidence that the state of our union is stronger.

But we gather here knowing that there are millions of Americans whose hard work and dedication have not yet been rewarded. Our economy is adding jobs – but too many people still can't find full-time employment. Corporate profits have rocketed to all-time highs – but for more than a decade, wages and incomes have barely budged.

It is our generation's task, then, to reignite the true engine of America's economic growth – a rising, thriving middle class.

It is our unfinished task to restore the basic bargain that built this country – the idea that if you work hard and meet your responsibilities, you can get ahead, no matter where you come from, what you look like, or who you love.

It is our unfinished task to make sure that this government works on behalf of the many, and not just the few; that it encourages free enterprise, rewards individual initiative, and opens the doors of opportunity to every child across this great nation.

The American people don't expect government to solve every problem. They don't expect those of us in this chamber to agree on every issue. But they do expect us to put the nation's interests before party. They do expect us to forge reasonable compromise where we can. For they know that America moves forward only when we do so together; and that the responsibility of improving this union remains the task of us all.

Our work must begin by making some basic decisions about our budget – decisions that will have a huge impact on the strength of our recovery.

Over the last few years, both parties have worked together to reduce the deficit by more than $2.5 trillion – mostly through spending cuts, but also by raising tax rates on the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans. As a result, we are more than halfway towards the goal of $4 trillion in deficit reduction that economists say we need to stabilize our finances.

Now we need to finish the job. And the question is, how?

In 2011, Congress passed a law saying that if both parties couldn't agree on a plan to reach our deficit goal, about a trillion dollars' worth of budget cuts would automatically go into effect this year. These sudden, harsh, arbitrary cuts would jeopardize our military readiness. They'd devastate priorities like education, energy, and medical research. They would certainly slow our recovery, and cost us hundreds of thousands of jobs. That's why Democrats, Republicans, business leaders, and economists have already said that these cuts, known here in Washington as "the sequester," are a really bad idea.

Now, some in this Congress have proposed preventing only the defense cuts by making even bigger cuts to things like education and job training; Medicare and Social Security benefits.

That idea is even worse. Yes, the biggest driver of our long-term debt is the rising cost of health care for an aging population. And those of us who care deeply about programs like Medicare must embrace the need for modest reforms – otherwise, our retirement programs will crowd out the investments we need for our children, and jeopardize the promise of a secure retirement for future generations.

But we can't ask senior citizens and working families to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction while asking nothing more from the wealthiest and most powerful. We won't grow the middle class simply by shifting the cost of health care or college onto families that are already struggling, or by forcing communities to lay off more teachers, cops, and firefighters. Most Americans – Democrats, Republicans, and Independents – understand that we can't just cut our way to prosperity. They know that broad-based economic growth requires a balanced approach to deficit reduction, with spending cuts and revenue, and with everybody doing their fair share. And that's the approach I offer tonight.

On Medicare, I'm prepared to enact reforms that will achieve the same amount of health care savings by the beginning of the next decade as the reforms proposed by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission. Already, the Affordable Care Act is helping to slow the growth of health care costs. The reforms I'm proposing go even further. We'll reduce taxpayer subsidies to prescription drug companies and ask more from the wealthiest seniors. We'll bring down costs by changing the way our government pays for Medicare, because our medical bills shouldn't be based on the number of tests ordered or days spent in the hospital – they should be based on the quality of care that our seniors receive. And I am open to additional reforms from both parties, so long as they don't violate the guarantee of a secure retirement. Our government shouldn't make promises we cannot keep – but we must keep the promises we've already made.

To hit the rest of our deficit reduction target, we should do what leaders in both parties have already suggested, and save hundreds of billions of dollars by getting rid of tax loopholes and deductions for the well-off and well-connected. After all, why would we choose to make deeper cuts to education and Medicare just to protect special interest tax breaks? How is that fair? How does that promote growth?

Now is our best chance for bipartisan, comprehensive tax reform that encourages job creation and helps bring down the deficit. The American people deserve a tax code that helps small businesses spend less time filling out complicated forms, and more time expanding and hiring; a tax code that ensures billionaires with high-powered accountants can't pay a lower rate than their hard-working secretaries; a tax code that lowers incentives to move jobs overseas, and lowers tax rates for businesses and manufacturers that create jobs right here in America. That's what tax reform can deliver. That's what we can do together.

I realize that tax reform and entitlement reform won't be easy. The politics will be hard for both sides. None of us will get 100 percent of what we want. But the alternative will cost us jobs, hurt our economy, and visit hardship on millions of hardworking Americans. So let's set party interests aside, and work to pass a budget that replaces reckless cuts with smart savings and wise investments in our future. And let's do it without the brinksmanship that stresses consumers and scares off investors. The greatest nation on Earth cannot keep conducting its business by drifting from one manufactured crisis to the next. Let's agree, right here, right now, to keep the people's government open, pay our bills on time, and always uphold the full faith and credit of the United States of America. The American people have worked too hard, for too long, rebuilding from one crisis to see their elected officials cause another.

Now, most of us agree that a plan to reduce the deficit must be part of our agenda. But let's be clear: deficit reduction alone is not an economic plan. A growing economy that creates good, middle-class jobs – that must be the North Star that guides our efforts. Every day, we should ask ourselves three questions as a nation: How do we attract more jobs to our shores? How do we equip our people with the skills needed to do those jobs? And how do we make sure that hard work leads to a decent living?

(계속)


[뉴스핌 Newspim]

[관련키워드]

[뉴스핌 베스트 기사]

사진
인터넷은행 신용대출 빗장 [서울=뉴스핌] 전미옥 기자 = 인터넷전문은행 3사가 일제히 신용대출 조이기에 나섰다. 금융당국의 신용대출 관리 강화 주문에 따라 시중은행에 이어 인터넷은행까지 나선 모습이다. [이미지=뉴스핌DB] 16일 카카오뱅크는 오는 22일부터 마이너스 통장 대출 한도를 최대 1억원으로 축소한다고 밝혔다. 약정액 5000만원 이상인 마이너스 통장의 대출을 연장할 때도 최근 6개월간 한도 사용률이 20% 이하인 경우 그 한도를 최대 20%까지 감액키로 했다. 케이뱅크는 이날부터 다음달 31일까지 신규 마이너스 통장 개설을 일시 중단하기로 했다. 고액 연봉자에 대한 신규 신용대출 한도도 축소할 예정이다. 토스뱅크는 신용대출 최대 한도를 기존 3억원에서 1억원으로 낮추고 마이너스통장 한도를 5000만원으로 조정할 예정이다. 마이너스통장을 5000만원까지 이용 중인 고객은 추가 신용대출을 최대 5000만원까지만 받을 수 있게 된다. 적용시기는 조율 중이다. 한편 시중은행은 지난주 신용대출 규제 방안을 잇따라 내놓은 바 있다. KB국민은행은 이날부터 마이너스 통장 신규 개설 한도를 5000만원, 이를 포함한 신용대출 신규 한도는 1억원으로 제한한다. 하나은행은 지난 12일부터 고액 연봉자 대상 신규 신용대출 한도를 1억원까지로 축소했고 우리은행도 같은날 비대면 신용대출 갈아타기 상품 접수를 중단했다. 신한은행은 비대면 신용 대출 하루 한도를 정해서 운영하고 있다. romeok@newspim.com 2026-06-16 11:01
사진
김명수 前 합참의장 영장 기각 [서울=뉴스핌] 박민경 기자 = 12·3 비상계엄에 관여한 혐의를 받는 김명수 전 합동참모본부 의장에 대한 구속영장이 15일 기각됐다. 반면 함께 영장이 청구된 전직 합참 수뇌부 3명에 대해서는 구속영장이 발부됐다. 부동식 서울중앙지법 내란영장전담 부장판사는 이날 내란중요임무종사 등 혐의를 받는 김 전 의장에 구속 전 피의자 심문(영장실질심사)를 열고 구속영장을 기각했다. 12·3 비상계엄에 관여한 혐의를 받는 김명수 전 합동참모본부 의장에 대한 구속영장이 15일 기각됐다. 사진은 서울 서초구 서울중앙지법 전경. [사진=뉴스핌DB] 반면, 이재식 전 합참 전비태세검열차장, 정진팔 전 합참 차장, 김흥준 전 육군본부 정책실장에 대해서는 구속영장을 발부했다. 부동식 부장판사는 김 전 의장에 대해 "주된 범죄 혐의에 대해 다툼의 여지가 있어 방어권 보장의 필요가 있다"며 "도망·증거인멸 염려가 없다"고 설명했다. 나머지 피의자에 대해선 증거인멸의 염려가 있다고 판단했다. 종합특검팀(특별검사 권창영)은 지난 9일 12·3 비상계엄 당시 합참 지휘통제실에서 내란 상황을 파악하고도 제지하지 않고, 계엄사령부를 함께 구성해 내란에 가담한 혐의로 김 전 의장 등에 대한 구속영장을 청구했다. 이들은 모두 내란중요임무종사 혐의를 받고 있다. 김 전 의장은 비상계엄 선포 이후 군 작전 지휘권을 가진 합참의장으로서 국회 병력 투입 등을 제지하지 않고, 계엄 상황을 지원하는 데 관여한 혐의를 받는다. 종합특검은 김 전 의장이 계엄 선포 직후 특수전사령부와 수도방위사령부 등에 '계엄사무를 우선하라'는 취지의 단편명령을 내림으로써 계엄에 관여한 것으로 의심하고 있다. 단편명령은 부대 행동 지침 등을 담은 간략한 작전명령이다. 종합특검은 합참 참모들이 계엄의 절차적 문제와 국회 병력 투입의 위법 소지를 제기했음에도 김 전 의장 등이 이를 제지하거나 김용현 전 국방부 장관 등에게 병력 철수를 건의하지 않은 것으로 보고 있다. 김 전 의장 측은 혐의를 부인하는 입장이다. 김 전 의장 측 변호인단은 지난 1일 "국회로 출동한 병력은 김 전 의장의 상관인 국방부 장관의 지휘를 받고 있어 당시 김 전 의장은 작전지휘권을 행사할 수 없는 상태였다"고 밝힌 바 있다. pmk1459@newspim.com 2026-06-16 07:55
기사 번역
결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.
종목 추적기

S&P 500 기업 중 기사 내용이 영향을 줄 종목 추적

결과물 출력을 준비하고 있어요.

긍정 영향 종목

  • Lockheed Martin Corp. Industrials
    우크라이나 안보 지원 강화 기대감으로 방산 수요 증가 직접적. 미·러 긴장 완화 불확실성 속에서도 방위산업 매출 안정성 강화 예상됨.

부정 영향 종목

  • Caterpillar Inc. Industrials
    우크라이나 전쟁 장기화 시 건설 및 중장비 수요 불확실성 직접적. 글로벌 인프라 투자 지연으로 매출 성장 둔화 가능성 있음.
이 내용에 포함된 데이터와 의견은 뉴스핌 AI가 분석한 결과입니다. 정보 제공 목적으로만 작성되었으며, 특정 종목 매매를 권유하지 않습니다. 투자 판단 및 결과에 대한 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다. 주식 투자는 원금 손실 가능성이 있으므로, 투자 전 충분한 조사와 전문가 상담을 권장합니다.
안다쇼핑
Top으로 이동